roomthreeseventeen
Inaugural Dopey Challenge finisher
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2009
But if you have to eat at 5:30pm, that throws the whole day off, halfway between lunch and dinner.
Same here, you can already get the chef's menu in the regular dining room, so Im' not sure why getting it in this new room make it worth that much more.
No kidding? Then what makes it special? I had no idea you could get the chef's menu in the regular dining room...
I called V&A today to find out about the new Queen Victoria room. The woman I spoke with seemed kind of confused about the new dining experience (since it doesn't begin until Feb 1). Either she is wrong, or the website is wrong. She said that every person will be charged $295, whether they want the wine pairings or not. She also said there is a set dining time for the Queen Victoria room (she thought it was 5:30 but was not sure). We won't be doing this if they force everyone to buy the wine pairings.
Got further clarification today - they will no longer let you order the Chef's Table menu in the regular dining room. So, basically, you have to either get the Chef's Table reservation, or pay $295 per person to sit in the Victoria room (whether or not you want the wine pairings). And from what I was told, the Chef's Table and Victoria room menus are exactly the same.
I do mourn the foie gras though, I really really really wish they could bring that back. Best foie gras I have ever had was at V&A's (and I've had it on every visit); no other place in or out of WDW ever compared.
It's your table for the night, up to a party of 8 (or is it 10?).
Do they really let just a couple eat there or does it have to be a group?
I'm on the fence about trying to get the CT or not anyway becuase well, I have the worst palette ever. I hate seafood despite trying to like it. Can't stand the texture of foie gras (I tried it at Chef Ramsay's place in NYC..I TRIED to like it), don't like mushrooms, etc.. I know, I TOTALLY stink! I'm not proud of it. DH on the other had will lap it all up. Would we be better off eating in the regular room? I wouldn't want to insult the chefs to their face anyway by being such a lame palette.
Yes, they really let couples eat there.
My opinion--if you're not open to trying new foods, preparations, etc. and have a lot of dislikes then V&A is a waste of money. It's not for the plain food/meat and potatoes crowd. Chef's Table or main dining room doesn't matter, the menu is similar.
Have you tried the foie gras at Raglan Road. It is my favorite!
I am taking my twin nephews to V&A to celebrate their 21st birthday in May. Both are foodies - one is a chef and the other works in a fine dining restaurant in Charleston as a server.
Thanks for your post. When I know the food I'm going to be given WILL be good, I'm wiling to try far more than at an average restaurant. I just won't risk it at any place I know may not be delivering the best each time ...which as we know is almost all places. That's probably why it's taken me until now to decide to try. I saw one of the menus designed for those that don't like seafood and it looked tasty. WHile I am more of a "meat and potatoes crowd", my DH is not. I'm really wanting to do this for him most of all. The same as I do sushi places for him. It's not fair to him to be handicapped by my sate palette.
I think maybe the regular dining room is a better choice. Let someone who truly wants to eat everything as they make it eat at CT.