Tigger2ntinkerbell
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2002
- Messages
- 1,867
I'm was selling my OKW 100pt contract at$150pp and Disney just took it back. The people buying it really wanted it, now I feel bad for them.
OKW extended, I presume? It still would be surprising.I'm was selling my OKW 100pt contract at$150pp and Disney just took it back. The people buying it really wanted it, now I feel bad for them.
Can you tell me if your contract was front loaded? Thanks!Re-check my paperwork I sold at $140 pp.
Yeah extended contract.
Front loaded???Can you tell me if your contract was front loaded? Thanks!
Did it have a lot of current points for use or was it stripped I think is what they are askingFront loaded???
Now you have to wonder if maybe there is a new strategy for DVD. Make resale more painful to drive some people to direct.
Goes along with making money no matter what that seems to be the guiding principle to recoup shutdown losses.
Resale ceilings appear to be getting higher and the savings gap between resale and direct seems to be shrinking, as well as resale availability for some resorts.
I'm not sure how more ROFR activity would either damage or destroy the resale market.This has been my suspicion due to rumors for some time that Disney's intent on seriously damaging if not destroying the resale market.
Goes along with making money no matter what that seems to be the guiding principle to recoup shutdown losses.
This is why we leapt on a VGF resale in our UY about a month ago.
With a wee negotiation, got $10pp less than current direct price with incentives. Smellin' like the proverbial
Waiting on the deed to arrive and happy as clams. (Yes, I'm shamelessly bragging.)
I'm not sure how more ROFR activity would either damage or destroy the resale market.
Maybe from a resale buyer's perspective it makes it less appealing. But Disney can't ROFR anything unless someone is attempting to buy a resale contract. So they kind of need the resale market to be active. And driving up resale prices through ROFR seems like it would do the exact opposite of "damaging" the resale market.
I'm not sure how more ROFR activity would either damage or destroy the resale market.
Maybe from a resale buyer's perspective it makes it less appealing.
But Disney can't ROFR anything unless someone is attempting to buy a resale contract. So they kind of need the resale market to be active. And driving up resale prices through ROFR seems like it would do the exact opposite of "damaging" the resale market.
This is why we leapt on a VGF resale in our UY about a month ago, being disinclined to wait to see what the new VGF ROFR range may be.
With a wee negotiation, got $10pp less than current direct price with incentives. Smellin' like the proverbial
Waiting on the deed to arrive and happy as clams. (Yes, I'm shamelessly bragging.)
I also think they are buying back so they can sell even higher than current posted rates. People are probably wanting to add-on even at higher rates too. Before people would want to decide on the BEST resort and buy all in one place. More people are interested in a portfolio with smaller amounts, direct with matching use years.