I agree with what lots of others have posted here about the show.
Early in its first season I actually was really bothered by the Jack character----not by the fact that he was such a "stereotype"...but more by the fact that his stereotypeness (I think I just invented a word!!

) was going to be used as comic relief and that he was going to be a side-kick to the more "upstanding" Will. I was really afraid that the show was going to set up a heirarchy of "good gay" vs. "bad gay" that juxtaposed masculine (well, by comparison at least!

), educated, professional, wealthy, asexual Will as somewhat better than effeminate, flighty, promiscuous, artsy Jack. That's a dynamic I really LOATHE. I mean I get that not every gay man fits into certain stereotypes of gay men that are out there...but the reality is that there are some (or many) of us who do. And the inevitable backlash of downplaying those stereotypes has often been the de-valuing (even by other LGBT folk) of men who might fit certain stereotypes of femininity, etc.
I was relieved as I kept up with the show, however, to find that, as many others have noted here, Jack was actually NOT just a silly sidekick....he was one of the more compelling characters---almost a backbone of the show....and that without him, the show would have been a total snooze-fest. I think that was a very affirming thing for all the "Jack MacFarlands" in the world to see on national TV!!
