bigAWL
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 2,515
I read this article about WDW's "Top 10 Best Restaurants,"
http://themeparks.about.com/cs/disneyparks/a/WDWbestDining.htm
and it got me thinking again about something that I've always wondered about: Why doesn't the MK have a really nice/upscale place to eat? I'd go so far as to say that WDW's signature park should have a signature restaurant.
The only theory I could come up with myself is the fact that no alcohol is served in the MK. I guess in general, fine dining is often associated with cocktails and fine wines. But would it be so bad (or unprofitable) to have one without the other? Or dare I suggest (is it blasphemous) that they could have one restaurant with an exception to this rule?
I don't know in the various Disneyland parks around the world if the MK-style parks have the same "dry" policy. Actually, I do know about the one in Paris - they have a great restaurant right on Main Street called Walt's American Restaurant with no shortage of wine and other spirits.
http://themeparks.about.com/cs/disneyparks/a/WDWbestDining.htm
and it got me thinking again about something that I've always wondered about: Why doesn't the MK have a really nice/upscale place to eat? I'd go so far as to say that WDW's signature park should have a signature restaurant.
The only theory I could come up with myself is the fact that no alcohol is served in the MK. I guess in general, fine dining is often associated with cocktails and fine wines. But would it be so bad (or unprofitable) to have one without the other? Or dare I suggest (is it blasphemous) that they could have one restaurant with an exception to this rule?
I don't know in the various Disneyland parks around the world if the MK-style parks have the same "dry" policy. Actually, I do know about the one in Paris - they have a great restaurant right on Main Street called Walt's American Restaurant with no shortage of wine and other spirits.


Oh that is so, so very wrong!