Originally posted by Disney Doll
Wouldn't bother me a bit to have a pet-friendly hotel or hotel wing. Of course, they'd have to not use it for folks who might be allergic to pet dander, but that's the same as smoking/non-smoking, and we live with that. I daresay, most people's pets are probably generally less annoying than most people themselves or their kids. I have been in DVC rooms where there have been crayoin and marker karks on the furniture and walls, spots on the rugs, nicked furniture, smoking odor in on-smoking rooms,missing kitchen utensils etc. People can do as much(and probably more)damage than my dog could ever dream of doing.
There's not really one good argument I can think of against pet-friendly that I couldn't find an equally compelling human behavior for. Pet friendly hotels are just not common, and therefore not accepted, unless the animal is a service animal. Come to think of it, with the degree of handicapped accessibility at WDW, I imagine that many of us have probably stayed in a room where an animal has been. Funny how there have been no known occurences of horrific health problems at WDW due to "allergies" to pet dander.