I disagree. My thoughts are that ROFR has little to do with selling price, and everything to do who buys the contract.doubletrouble_vb said:I think prices will start falling as soon as the ROFR price point decreases. Current prices aren't where they are because individual buyers were bidding up the price. They are where they are because Disney is the 800 pound gorilla in the buying pool.
At the risk of disagreeing with MG, I have to agree with this. ROFR artificially inflates resale prices, and it is the only thing holding prices at their current levels. Disney uses ROFR to prop up the resale prices so they can sell "new" at a profitable price point. If there were too much difference, nobody in their right mind would buy new from Disney.doubletrouble_vb said:I think prices will start falling as soon as the ROFR price point decreases. Current prices aren't where they are because individual buyers were bidding up the price. They are where they are because Disney is the 800 pound gorilla in the buying pool.
Dean said:Most RTU timeshare start to drop around just under 30 years but it depends on where DVC is in terms of sales and ROFR actions.
Dean,Dean said:Most RTU timeshare start to drop around just under 30 years but it depends on where DVC is in terms of sales and ROFR actions.
Just under 30 years remaining, somewhere in the 2014-2017 range. But it will be relative and depend on a lot on where DVC is with ROFR and new sales. And initially it may simple be a mild widening of the gap between retail and resale and not a true reduciton in the price.debloco said:I am not sure which "way" this is figured...
does this mean after 30 years of use (so from the start year) or 30 years back from the ending year?
To use my home resort, VWL, as an example
Start year 2000
30 years from start year is 2030
30 years from end year is 2012
Not that it really matters to me, I'm just wondering.
I feel many people don't understand the financials involved here. Ignoring the benefit to Disney in general of having a captive audience weekend and week out, I simply don't see it happening. Lets assume Disney wanted to extend all of DVC to the 2054 time, an extra 12 years. They woudln't be able to sell it new for 12 years or less, at least not reasonably. And to justify doing so, they'd need a high percentage of owners to extend, likely 75% or more. And getting that amount of participation would take doing it for free or nearly so. I'd say the max would be some where around $10 per point would be the max one could look at. But to be honest, this is one of many things I'd love to be wrong about.Rozzie said:good point Dean.
So you really don't see extensions happening? I will always put money on whatever you have to share!
Your depth of knowledge on the industry is admirable!!!
There are many examples of timeshares out there that are RTU including some top ones that were sold when they only had 30 years remaining when they were new.Mississippian said:Dean,
I think you are right on the money on the 30-year mark.
Back in college, when I was being taught in business class how to value a bond, we were told to ignore the present value of the corpus if it was over 30 years out. The only factor was the income stream.
I really think the same is true for DVC. As long as you have more than 30 years to go, then a 40-year timeshare really isn't worth less than a 99-year timeshare.
Obviously 54 years is better than 40 years, whatever the actual figures are. If you calculate the personal value of staying at BWV or BCV, where you can walk to the parks and have lots of dining options, it's certainly worth a few hundred dollars a year. Take what the convenience is worth, invest that amount additionally in the stock market, and in 40 years you will have enough money to buy whatever you want. Of course, I'll be so old that I will be using the money for my nursing home!