besides the swirly attempt at censoring?!?! am going to start printing this main body of invite for a wedding that we are paying for. does this seem OK?
besides the swirly attempt at censoring?!?! am going to start printing this main body of invite for a wedding that we are paying for. does this seem OK?
its one "l" ut rhat does look good weird to me!! i like the bottom font, but its awfully heavy for top and bottom, the curly 'albermarle swirl' on the top repeats on our STDs and the RSVP portion and the little insert thingy that has site info and the DFTW website link. That font isn't bold enough when enlarged i thought to be our names? The "circus-y" one i just liked and i did want to do something with all different fonts, it looks overly plain to me when they are all one, but that font is too busy to make any smaller - hard to read!
i guess i put the "wdw's wedding pavilion" part because i think saying wedding pavilion is more helpful than the street address in this instance but just wedding pavilion seemed to short! maybe i will try it wothout that phrase and see if i can increase the font size?
I agree. I think the 3 fonts is a little too busy. But I also think (and this is just my .02) that the bottom font is too circus-y for a formal event at the WP. I'd stick with the top one and the fancy one for your names.
Oh, and if you're sticking to tradition ... the bride's name gets to be listed first!