I don't find it touching at all. I wouldn't of even let them attend the public memorial, that is just me. I bet this family is looking at these kids as cash cows now, nothing surprises me with them. I hate to be nasty on the day of someones memorial but I just have a radicaly different view of this and can't keep it to myself.
I got that feeling too, when they were taken up on stage to sing We Are the World -- fine to let the kids speak, but they didn't have to expect them to sing.
I also think it was the kids choice to attend and definately Paris' choice to speak. OMG it brought me to tears hearing her - it brings back the emotions of my BIL's funeral especially since my neice is the same age as Paris. It breaks my heart to see the kids missing their daddy so much. He seemed like he was a really good father to those kids and I can only imagine how hard this is going to be for them.
None of us could know that they wanted to attend, although I agree with you that Paris did choose to speak (looked like it was going to be Janet)
In my opinion, the one thing Michael did right was protect his children from the media. He didn't want them photographed, never mind on international tv. No matter what the child wanted, I think Michael's well known views should have been followed.
I think you're probably right here. However, that could have also been accomplished by making it clear to the cameramen that the children were not to be shown (at least while sitting in their seats) -- they deserve to be given some privacy at a time like this. Even at Princess Diana's funeral (which was actually
the funeral), the kids were not shown during or after the service. And those kids were a lot older.
Yes, the agressive paparazzi and media certainly have managed to snag a few shots. I don't think there is any question of their fathers view on the subject.
If he only took one thing seriously in the last several years of his lfe, it was keeping his children out of the public spotlight. This should have been respected.
However the children wanted to participate, it should, of course have taken place at the family's private memorial service, not in front of a crowd of ticket holders a t the Staples Centre.
Good point. This was not the funeral. It was only the first of several memorials that the Jackson family is planning around the world.
I think it was good for the kids to be there, especially given all the nice things said about their Dad. If the service had been a circus - I'd feel differently, but this service was very touching and respectful. As for whether the kids should have been shown publically, according to an interview with Debbie Rowe - she is the one who wanted them covered all the time - not Michael, he just obliged her wishes. Whether or not we should believe her I don't know.
this is incorrect -- he stated on many occasions that he didn't want his kids to be seen -- apparently they just agreed on this. There was no way they could have known exactly how it would turn out -- luckily, it was more subdued than most people expected. They could have watched the memorial on video, or from a private area in the arena (not sure if they had skyboxes there) There is also no way they could have known how the kids would react, especially when hearing their father's voice.
But, it seems like most public memorials in the US do have the kids there eg. 911, the Challenger shuttle. Personally, I don't feel very good about watching a family, especially children, in their very private grief. I don't have an opinion either way on whether the kids should have attended -- I don't know them, I wasn't there when the decision was made. I think it would have been fine and understood if they did not attend the public memorial. I just feel they should have been given more privacy. But if they were my kids, I would definitely have them attend the funeral and the wake -- it's always hard, but it is something that helps people move on after the death of a loved one.