I despise that church. I looked at the report and the one it linked to though and I see why it was done. It looks like the church was picketing on public property and not private. While I think these people are terrible, horrible human beings with slanted views on religion they do have the right to protest on public property.
I think what happened was the original jury looked at the emotional arguments in the case as opposed to the legal arguments and that is why the case was overturned. Regardless of what you think about the group or any other group the right to assemble and protest has nothing to do with what they are protesting.
I don't defend this church and I do not agree with a single thing they do or stand for but they are entitled to do what they are provided they are obeying the law. The emotion has to be set aside and the case looked at for what it is legally.
Every time an article is written about them, someone physically attacks them, or sues them for something that ultimately isn't illegal they are playing into their hands. If everyone just ignored them and didn't respond of publicize them they would go away.