^^^ I love that Sea World picture! That's a great picture.
San Diego to Sacramento is a
really long drive!
It's good that Universal was kind of sandwiched in between other things -- and that Sea World came later. It would have been a shame to go into the home stretch of your trip with a lackluster visit to a place that you all didn't love. At least you finished up the "theme parks aspect" of your journey with Sea World, which seems to have been a big hit!
It's funny that you mentioned Mike encountering some Farmers Market merchants frowning on photos in their shops. That was not always the case, and it seems like it must be a fairly recent development in the Market's history. Certainly there have been many camera-toting people passing through the shops for decades, and I'm sure that some of them have taken photos!
I wonder if what Mike encountered in the FM shops is similar to what
Bret/mvf-m11c encountered at DLR (maybe on Buena Vista Street?) a couple of years ago. He was taking photos in a shop of some kind back in 2012, and a CM told him he couldn't take photos.
I take tons of photos of merchandise in the DLR shops, and no one has ever told me not to. Then again, I'm just using a point & shoot -- and I have a feeling that makes a big difference. I am inclined to think that anyone with a more professional-looking camera (especially any kind of DSLR) might be stopped from taking photos of merchandise, or in the stores. Maybe the merchants see the expensive cameras and think that the photographers are going to sell the photos. I'm not exactly sure what the reason is, but I strongly suspect that the type of camera that's being used has something to do with the 'No Photo' rules.
Coincidentally, I encountered a "No Photos" sign in a Catalina shop 2 days ago. I had already been taking photos -- only 2 or 3 -- in the shop before I saw the sign. After I saw the sign I took 2 or 3 more photos. No one stopped me or said anything. I had the camera in my hand the whole time. So, again, I am inclined to think that it's mainly the people with the more professional cameras that the merchants are worried about, for whatever reason.
I went to Sprinkles yesterday and used my free birthday cupcake coupon -- that was my very first Sprinkles cupcake, ever. (And the line was super-short!


I couldn't believe it!) I tried the orange cupcake, with orange-vanilla frosting, because they didn't have any lemon cupcakes ready and I wanted something citrusy. I know that you have not yet had a Sprinkles cupcake, so I will say this much: the Sprinkles cupcake was fine. It was good enough -- and it was even better
because it was free! The frosting was good. The cupcake was pretty fresh and moist. However, the actual
cake part of the cupcake was not the best I've tasted. It was okay, but I've tasted better cake flavor in other (less expensive) cupcakes before.
So I would say that a free Sprinkles cupcake would be great (and they give out a lot of freebies through their crazy 'secret words' announced on Facebook every week), but I don't
think I would pay whatever they charge for another cupcake, or for a whole box of cupcakes. Then again, I say that having only tried one flavor. Maybe the other flavors are better. It wasn't a
bad cupcake by any means, but it wasn't the best-tasting cupcake I've had.
I think that Sprinkles is so popular because they have a fun, colorful store design and logo, and because customers think that if they pay more money for a cupcake, the taste must be better. Sometimes paying more money for something will guarantee better quality and taste, but not always...