...have been really busy but have been following this thread
for several reasons. to me, i always look @ this section as the "business
section". & it was a lil'surprising that even though this was a dvc usage
problem, there were no posts about whether this was right/legal. also
disappointed with all the timeshare experts, that didn't add their input. however,
i think this is a good example , that no response is revealing too.
anytime these types of posts come up...i begin by asking if
the action is possible. now no regular member on either
side of the fence can do this...but how about the organization?
stocking piling dvc rooms like in a special rci program, where
certain /privileged members have them on the ready...it
reminds me that dvc has rules for regular members but
there are a sub group doing things outside the "structure?!"
and by this post , extending to rci. i learn this, when we
did our first , major revs....& ever since that time been
observing what going on....& it all goes in one direction.
(meaning things that should be done, has not occurred.)
i don't think this post was just something for attention.
also i believe you made your comments based
on a "person to person" exchange. i know "what" i think you are
implicating but more details- sure would be helpful. regardless ,
....it got me thinking about things i never would have.
one example,
rci trading into dvc. how many never get a dvc room? if one thinks
about how many rci members & the limited trading out, this should
be a large number, unless stuff liked this is being permitted.
to me it speaks--"Who" can owners really trust that dvc is not adding
extra rooms than those trading out? together if similar transactions are
being permitted, would give all the credit that owners are in~deeds
being "ripped off ". ( to what extent & $ amounts)
wonder if this is a better business issue because all these renters
that have no right to the dvc rooms & all the services they are
using but being paid by who? that's right, dvc owners.
hidden costs like all the wear & tear %, the utilities, the cleaning ...i
think there are some real ($) issues that have been piling up , just
adding up the "how many" on ebay sites. so claiming once a trade
is made dvc owners has no interest is incorrect. plus the fact that
someone posted this happening has true merit too me.
many times,
i think when these types of posts "pop up", they are coming from
inside the organization & being overheard by workers that
recognized- some are doing wrong...but are under their "authority"...
their frustrations are in their expressions. it is appreciated they
care enough to post their concerns.
what i learn most from reading here, that one of the biggest
problem facing dvc owners..is rci professionals exchangers,
especially inside the dvc. maybe the new best kept secret.
( not only to established professional renter sites on ebay,
but to continue building them, & then the lack of negative feedback. )
can anything be done?
now i am no rci owner but it seem to me, based on the dvc demands
...and c so many trying to get "insider" advice here,... there should only
be one trade offer per q3years, by doing this,
it would be fair~er to the regular rci owners trying to do dvc, per
their rules? & i'll add what i think about the rci network- even though
i am not a rci member. (see? "s~dvc girl?") ....the rci renting dvc rooms
to others are 100% affecting dvc members via lost rooms and costs.
by limiting rci members q/3/y, would discourage rci pros
from working/creating these renting businesses.
also, s~dvc girl , if i was in charge @ dvc, i removed certain
dvc resorts......like blt, from any rci trades. reducing these
resorts would also reduced the "popularity" of renting via rci.
fyi, my position continue to"feel stronger", when i read
posts here & other sites, similar to the "buying direct" ones.
look @ the responses...that are "doing" exactly what this
post "wonder about".....connect the dots!
anyway,
for us, one of our first-level priority was getting away from certain
groups -liked the tours/b groups. how long before tour groups realize
they too can get dvc rooms via the rci/trade in's connections/ @
--bargain prices? i don't blame them. except we are owners, it is a major
dvc problem, just based on a single ethical issue-"dues". wasn't the
intended purpose for permitting renting in the first place, so owners don't
let their points waste when life prevented a dvc vacation? unethical,
based on owners paying for "wear,tear & services"-esp. by those using
this loophole for individual profits.
so "s"~dvc girl, what "good" is it for members- when
the company does nothing to stop others /rci professionals plus insider
workers, and members breaking established dvc rules? especially
rules that rci renters are resulting... in higher dues? again~ &
again...i am asking?--why do we never "see" people reporting
about these rci rentals being cax. ? yeah, where are their
postings?
just one of many reasons why i sent that package...., just
saying , i am believer of "theft prevention".....especially being a blt owner,
paying for illegal activities---and seeing how dvc adding all the rci renters'
electric/water/air conditioning/heating/garbage disposal , laundry- like
sheets/towels to my dues....like i was taught growing up--"the best
way to hurt someone doing you "wrong" is in the pocket book."
don't think the average time share owners are doing the wrongs.
so is dvc going to take all these sites from rci owners, selling dvc rooms
& refund back all their expenses to the owners? that would be the right
thing to do.
...& what about other grey areas. why doesn't dvc management
consider the ethical obligation when deciding their course of
actions?
if blt dues are paying for it...then unless you "add" the other
dvc resorts to our dues... why do they get this perk for free?
(while every blt owner is paying?) i see that very unfair? if i was in
charge, there would be a "coverage charge for non-owners & apply
the $ to blt owners' dues....and if non members want to go, then
double the price ..& reduce all blt members' dues. see my position
"s~girl?"....i define stealing when i am paying for something that
others are using thru dvc lack of management...betcha, if
your bosses had these $$$ coming out of their pay, these
oversights would stop. it just like direct vs
resales...when are they going to fix it? ( specifically--when the economy
"dipped" & professionally timeshares mangers picked up the low cost
resorts, flipping them into new businesses---i am saying the dvc
was never meant to fuel this type of business & as a "matter"
of policy- against professional renters...
there are many, many corrective measures dvc can do to prevent
these losses. i brought our dvc for a gift but anything that
costing me money, has my interest.
some are very, very simple. like "only" permitting renting
@ one's home resorts...especially since many professional renters
went after the bargain resorts as to get the most points. this restriction
alone, would also add more availability ...to regular resale /direct
owners.
sorry to lecture s-girl but there was another major reason this thread
caught my attention.....based on a pre/Christmas thread where an
owner reported their room was downgraded from a 2-
bedroom villa. if one connected the dots...alarms should have went
off...behind the scenes. my concerns are based on the same
thing on the other "side", $$$. the bargain hunters may not realize it but
the $ making up their savings-- are from owners' pockets. "connecting
the dots" is a very good measurement that i use often. this thread is
a good example based on another thread ( s~dvc girl ) & one
"later on" with the topic buying direct. this poster mentioned
the better value was to buy useless rci & flip them for dvc getting
special/insider perks. those perks over regular /dvc owners.
...( hoping there are specific "catch phases" triggers dvc
monitors' attention?)...this poster received negative feedback.
but i found the well-respected rci "pro" on the other thread ,
stated he is doing exactly what this poster suggested...including
selling his dvc. interesting he did not get the same
negative feedback? right? so by putting these 2 posts
together, illustrated significant findings "effecting" the
well being of dvc & to me, not in a good way