Warning about Ortho Evra

ophie

<font color=teal>I've got color<br><font color=red
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
4,339
Warning issued about the patch.
Warning issued about birth-control patch

The makers of a popular birth-control patch warned millions of women Thursday that the patch exposes them to significantly higher doses of hormones and may put them at greater risk for blood clots and other serious side effects than previously disclosed.

The warning from Johnson and Johnson subsidiary Ortho McNeil, makers of Ortho Evra, says women using the patch will be exposed to about 60 percent more estrogen than those using typical birth-control pills because hormones from patches get into the bloodstream and are removed from the body differently than those from pills.

Thursday's warning comes four months after reports that patch users die and suffer blood clots at a rate three times higher than women taking the pill.

Citing federal death and injury reports, The Associated Press found that about a dozen women, most in their late teens and early 20s, died in 2004 from blood clots believed to be related to the birth-control patch, and dozens more survived strokes and other clot-related problems.

Ortho McNeil spokeswoman Bonnie Jacobs said Thursday that the warning speaks for itself and that the company has been cooperating with the Food and Drug Administration, which distributed the new warning to health care providers.

More than 4 million women have used the patch since it went on sale in 2002. Several lawsuits have been filed by families of women who died or suffered blood clots while using the patch, and lawyers said more are planned.

Documents released to attorneys as a result of that litigation show Ortho McNeil has been analyzing the FDA's death and injury reports, creating its own charts that document a higher rate of blood clots and deaths in association with the patch than with the pill.

In addition, an internal Ortho McNeil memo shows that the company refused, in 2003, to fund a study comparing its Ortho Evra patch to its Ortho-Cyclen pill because of concerns there was "too high a chance that study may not produce a positive result for Evra" and there was a "risk that Ortho Evra may be the same or worse than Ortho-Cyclen."

Last week, in response to questions about the Ortho McNeil memo, company spokesman Michael Beckerich said in a written statement that "decisions to fund studies are based upon scientific merit."

Beckerich said Ortho McNeil is conducting its own epidemiological study "designed with input from the FDA and similar to those previously conducted with the Pill."

Although the patch and most birth-control pills contain the same amounts of estrogen, new published studies show that women using the patch absorb about 50 percent more estrogen than with the pill, said Dr. Leslie Miller, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Washington.

When women take the pill, the medication is absorbed into the bloodstream through the digestive tract. In the process, about half of the estrogen dose is lost.

Hormone levels in women on the pill are highest one or two hours after taking it, Miller said. Twelve hours later, estrogen levels are quite low, meaning the body is not exposed to high levels of estrogen 24 hours a day.

But the patch causes higher estrogen levels since delivery of medication continues all day. Those elevated levels may be high enough to increase some women's risk of blood clots, Miller said.

"If the patch is delivering too much estrogen, then it may need to be redesigned," Miller said. "Women should not just take off their patch; they risk pregnancy. If they are worried and want to change off the patch, they can wait to get something else."

Jennifer Cowperthwaite, 26, of Broad Brook, Connecticut, still suffers breathing problems after a blood clot reached her lungs two years ago while using the patch. She said the warnings were long overdue.

"I wish I had known," she said. "It's quite likely I would never have used it."

Erika Klein's sister Kathleen Thoren died a year ago from blood clots in her brain that the coroner said were brought on by Ortho Evra. She said women deserve to be informed when making birth-control decisions.

"Women have a right to know the true risks and make their decisions based on that information," she said. "No one should have to go through what my sister went through."
This really sucks. The patch is so convenient. But, I'm thinking it's not worth that sort of risk.
 
Well, honestly, the story takes some liberties in that, as yet, there's no proof that the increased estrogen is "causing" any additional risk for the side effects. But, for me, the fact that you're getting so much more estrogen with the patch than you do with any pill is scary enough. I mean, why submit yourself to that? I have loved the patch since it's been available, but now I'm switching. That much extra estrogen isn't necessary and it can't be good.
 
THe Patch is too much of a hassle for me. Once a week? I much prefer once a month. Nuvaring is a once a month birth control. It's inserted and stays there for 3 weeks. Remove it for a week. Then put another one in. It's great. I don't know why the doctors on the news aren't mentioning this. It's much more convenient than the patch. I've used nuvaring for 3 years now with no problems. (www.nuvaring.com
 

Looks like I'm going back to the pill. I almost did after the first story about the deaths hit...oh well. Back to one a day...I'll look into the once a month thing though!
 
A few young girls have died in the NY area over the last few years, they said it was all directly related to using the patch.

I'm steering clear.
 
It really doesn't surprise me. I know that the patch works well for so many people but my experience with it was not that great.

I will caveat by saying that I have trouble with most forms of oral contraceptives. Well, not really trouble, but most make me queasy. I have not bleeding problems or anything else.

My doctor gave me the patch thinking it would "bypass" the digestive system and thereby reduce nausea. So, I did a first-day start by applying the patch the first day of my menstrual cycle. WHOA. I bled so heavy for 3 days, I couldn't belive it. And the cramping...whew! Then the nausea hit. Nausea so extreme, no pill had ever caused that. So I ripped that darn thing off and felt a lot better the next day.

I realize that there is a very low "overall" dose in the patch, but I think it really depends on who an individual absorbs the med through the skin. I think I was just getting a super-high dose right away.

So, I can see how it would cause some problems.
 
Melrosgirl said:
THe Patch is too much of a hassle for me. Once a week? I much prefer once a month. Nuvaring is a once a month birth control. It's inserted and stays there for 3 weeks. Remove it for a week. Then put another one in. It's great. I don't know why the doctors on the news aren't mentioning this. It's much more convenient than the patch. I've used nuvaring for 3 years now with no problems. (www.nuvaring.com


I second this. I have been on the ring for over three years and I love it. No side effects, insert and three weeks remove. Tadaa! The patch was an original option for me, but once a week is once a week too often. Now after reading this, I am glad I decided on the ring.
 
Thank you for posting this. It's the first that I've heard about it.

DD is 18 and has been using this for a year and a half or so. Prior to trying this, she had cramps and vomiting so severe with her periods that she was totally incapacitated for one to two days a month. She generally had to be taken to the doctor to get shots to stop the pain and vomiting. Now she "only feels a little yucky" (as she describes it) which is a huge improvement. She had tried the pills for a couple of months but kept forgetting to take them, so she loved the patches.

It looks like she's a prime candidate for these problems, and we'd better go back to see her doctor. Thank you again for posting.
 
I am thinking about switching to the Ring after reading this. Can anyone who uses it PM me about ease of use. I think that's what has kept me from using it so far.

And how much does it usually cost?
 
One thing these releases don't say is that a lot of these women who died were smokers (which I've seen in some of the scientific data from the causes). There is scientific evidence that smoking increases the risk of blot clots in any woman who takes any kind of birth control hormones, not just the patch (and the warning is listed in the inserts that comes with the drug). I'm a biologist and I have done research into the subject since I am a patch user. I love my patch and I've never had any issues from it. The nuvaring also causes hormones to be elevated 24 hours just like the patch does, so using that instead of the patch isn't exactly that different as far as elevated estrogen levels are concerned. It's important to remember that correlation doesn't equal causation in matters such as this. Women do get blood clots and die from all forms of hormonal birth control -- pills, shots, patch, ring -- every year. Statistically speaking, it is safer to be on hormonal birth control than to have a baby, which also carries it's own risks.
 
Equidae said:
One thing these releases don't say is that a lot of these women who died were smokers (which I've seen in some of the scientific data from the causes). There is scientific evidence that smoking increases the risk of blot clots in any woman who takes any kind of birth control hormones, not just the patch (and the warning is listed in the inserts that comes with the drug). I'm a biologist and I have done research into the subject since I am a patch user. I love my patch and I've never had any issues from it. The nuvaring also causes hormones to be elevated 24 hours just like the patch does, so using that instead of the patch isn't exactly that different as far as elevated estrogen levels are concerned. It's important to remember that correlation doesn't equal causation in matters such as this. Women do get blood clots and die from all forms of hormonal birth control -- pills, shots, patch, ring -- every year. Statistically speaking, it is safer to be on hormonal birth control than to have a baby, which also carries it's own risks.
No one is saying that there aren't risks with all hormonal birth control. I looked at the info about the people that died and the numbers are not statistically significant. (That may sound horrible to say, but in a scientific sense, it's roughly the same as other methods). But OrthoMcNeil is now saying that patch users are exposed to 60% more hormone than pill users. That just doesn't seem necessary to me. And that's why I'm switching. Why expose myself to that much more hormone just for convenience sake? I mean, I LOVED the patch. I've been on it since it came out, but it's just not necessary, you know?

I'd be interested in hearing if the nuva ring has the same issues with excess hormone exposure.
 
Equidae said:
One thing these releases don't say is that a lot of these women who died were smokers (which I've seen in some of the scientific data from the causes). There is scientific evidence that smoking increases the risk of blot clots in any woman who takes any kind of birth control hormones, not just the patch (and the warning is listed in the inserts that comes with the drug). I'm a biologist and I have done research into the subject since I am a patch user. I love my patch and I've never had any issues from it. The nuvaring also causes hormones to be elevated 24 hours just like the patch does, so using that instead of the patch isn't exactly that different as far as elevated estrogen levels are concerned. It's important to remember that correlation doesn't equal causation in matters such as this. Women do get blood clots and die from all forms of hormonal birth control -- pills, shots, patch, ring -- every year. Statistically speaking, it is safer to be on hormonal birth control than to have a baby, which also carries it's own risks.


I think it's not just the warnings that are making me want to switch, but also the side effects I have been having with the patch. I was just doing some research on another site and someone was also asking about if nuva ring has had the same problems, and they said no one has died with the same sort of problems as those on the patch. I believe they have been out around the same amount of time too.
 
I just took myself off of the patch two weeks ago. I could not stand how I kept extra water weight due to the hormone released into my body. Since coming off of the patch, I've just watched the water come right off of my body.
 
OK
I have used the nuva ring.
Hated it.
I use the patch.
Now with its problems won't use it.
What is left for a 49 year old women,
going through menopause other than the pill?
 
Well, my mom is 51 and she refused to be on BC at her age. It's too much of a risk factor in and of itself. She had a procedure called uterine ablation with Novasure.
 
Bumping this.
I went to the doctor today and told him I wanted to switch from the patch to nuvaring and he said "good choice". Let's hope I have less side effects with the ring.

He went on and on about how they originally didn't know how high the hormones actually are in the patch. 3 more days and I am off it for good.
 
Nuvaring is phenomenal. I highly recommend it.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom