BeachClub2014
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- Messages
- 1,707
Okay. You'll get no argument from me.The way to fix it is to right-size supply and demand with point cost... There's a reason why this isn't an issue every day....
Okay. You'll get no argument from me.The way to fix it is to right-size supply and demand with point cost... There's a reason why this isn't an issue every day....
OH I honestly didn't realize that. So DVC would have to shift funds from other operating expenses in order to staff more MS? Or would DVC have to cover costs above the 12%?Just to add, the fee we pay MS to manage the program is fixed…it’s 12% of the operating budget.
So, the more costs, the less cushion DVC has within their budget.
Meaning, owners can’t pay DVC more…DVC would have to take it from that same 12% they get now.
I really have 0 faith in this considering how bad the online booking tool is.I'm sure the braintrust at DVC can figure out the details of any changes to be implemented to reduce/eliminate walking without harming the average member.
Not sure where the reference to phone calls to member services originates, but not from me. I try to avoid calling them at all.
End of the day, stopping walking is easily accomplished, should DVC desire to do so. That is why I emailed them with my opinion as opposed to just complaining about it here.
Okay. I do have faith in their ability to manage DVC and also address this problem, should they choose to do so, and I hope they do.OH I honestly didn't realize that. So DVC would have to shift funds from other operating expenses in order to staff more MS? Or would DVC have to cover costs above the 12%?
I really have 0 faith in this considering how bad the online booking tool is.
The reference to MS phone support is relevant because that was the initial reason for the change in booking this way.
Maybe I am a pessimist, but nothing, especially when dealing with Disney/DVC, is easy.
It’s a simple algorithm…. will an action cost them money or make them money this quarter. If it’s going to cost them more money (new IT, more calls to MS)… probably not going to happen….Okay. I do have faith in their ability to manage DVC and also address this problem, should they choose to do so, and I hope they do.
OH I honestly didn't realize that. So DVC would have to shift funds from other operating expenses in order to staff more MS? Or would DVC have to cover costs above the 12%?
I really have 0 faith in this considering how bad the online booking tool is.
The reference to MS phone support is relevant because that was the initial reason for the change in booking this way.
Maybe I am a pessimist, but nothing, especially when dealing with Disney/DVC, is easy.
Okay. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and clearing up the issue. I won't debate whether DVC management will or won't make any changes, as there is very little upside to that argument.It’s a simple algorithm…. will an action cost them money or make them money this quarter. If it’s going to cost them more money (new IT, more calls to MS)… probably not going to happen….
I'm sure the braintrust at DVC can figure out the details of any changes to be implemented to reduce/eliminate walking without harming the average member.
Not sure where the reference to phone calls to member services originates, but not from me. I try to avoid calling them at all.
End of the day, stopping walking is easily accomplished, should DVC desire to do so. That is why I emailed them with my opinion as opposed to just complaining about it here.
Okay. I was just clarifying in my post that I hadn't ever suggested a return to calling MS for reservations. I'm not sure why anyone would want to go back to that hassle.The phone calls reference was made by the board last year.
They explained that the reason behind the change to the booking process from check out to check in plus 7 was because the goal was to reduce the amount of time owners need to contact MS to get the trips booked.
My view is the whole situation could be most easily rectified by having a points chart that accurately reflected demand trends...
December - particularly early December is "too good a deal"... which results in this feeding frenzy and pandemonium... The points chart needs to be redone - December is too low for example.... and other seasons - including parts of the summer - are too high in my view.
Much of the year doesn't have this problem. It's these few times that the demand and points are completely out of alignment.
I do not believe they have the ability to adjust the relationship between studios and 1 bedrooms, but that is another part of the problem as well...
https://www.dvcrofr.com/tools/dvc-vs-rack-ratesMy view is the whole situation could be most easily rectified by having a points chart that accurately reflected demand trends...
https://www.dvcrofr.com/tools/dvc-vs-rack-rates
Your point prompted me to spend a little time looking at dvcrofr's tool that compares points cost to rack rates and the percentage savings. Much of December really is an outlier in terms of the savings you'll get on DVC over paying Disney's cash rates for the same room. I don't really see any other month with so many days in it that has that kind of savings. Interestingly, the month that sticks out to me as having the most savings after December is September, perhaps, suggesting points could also be too low for that month. May also seems to be a month with some consistently higher than average savings. Summer and some parts of the spring seem to be the times where points result is less savings. Of course, I'm sure this is only part of the puzzle to determining points charts.
Will be interesting to see what, if any, changes are made with the 2027 points charts. Could give an indication whether this is part of Disney's response to the commercial renting and walking issues or whether we're left with a "personal use" box and, perhaps, something else (or nothing at all).
Yes, and Summer is becoming less and less popular it feels to me...DVC has a responsibility to try to make the charts match supply and demand of DVC owners as best they can.
But, summer is hot and fall are the holidays so it’s never going to be perfect.
Yes, and Summer is becoming less and less popular it feels to me...
The tool really highlight the poor value from 1-bedroomshttps://www.dvcrofr.com/tools/dvc-vs-rack-rates
Your point prompted me to spend a little time looking at dvcrofr's tool that compares points cost to rack rates and the percentage savings. Much of December really is an outlier in terms of the savings you'll get on DVC over paying Disney's cash rates for the same room. I don't really see any other month with so many days in it that has that kind of savings. Interestingly, the month that sticks out to me as having the most savings after December is September, perhaps, suggesting points could also be too low for that month. May also seems to be a month with some consistently higher than average savings. Summer and some parts of the spring seem to be the times where points result in less savings. Of course, I'm sure this is only part of the puzzle to determining points charts.
Will be interesting to see what, if any, changes are made with the 2027 points charts. Could give an indication whether this is part of Disney's response to the commercial renting and walking issues or whether we're left with a "personal use" box and, perhaps, something else (or nothing at all).
The tool really highlight the poor value from 1-bedrooms
It would be suicide for DVC to do it but they really need to rebalance the points between studios and 1 bedrooms as much as possible to ease demand and make 1 bedroom villas a better deal.
It would be suicide for DVC to do it but they really need to rebalance the points between studios and 1 bedrooms as much as possible to ease demand and make 1 bedroom villas a better deal.
I don’t think it’s because too many owners want same thing, rather appears many commercial renters book these and sell reservations. I may be wrong. I understand it is sensitive subject.The whole reason this is a hot topic is because it’s a very polarizing idea and it does frustrate people.
And, as I said, people do it because they are afraid of getting shut out because too many other owners want the same thing.
This comes up at this time every year because now is the time when people have begun walking in earnest toward those October to December trips!!!
The original iteration of the 2020 points charts increased points for both studios and 1BR in order to decrease points for 2BR. It caused great furor, and DVC was forced to back down and issue revised 2020 points charts that simply adjusted for seasons as usual. Many owners, including myself, believe it's illegal for them to reallocate between villa sizes (even though they got away with it on the SSR treehouses). So I sincereley doubt that they'll reallocate between studios and 1BR in existing resorts; maybe LSL, being new, will have 1BR points costs set to make them "a better deal."It would be suicide for DVC to do it but they really need to rebalance the points between studios and 1 bedrooms as much as possible to ease demand and make 1 bedroom villas a better deal.