Mixing resort and DVC rooms is nothing new for Disney. That's what they did at AKV-Jambo. Originally Jambo was a stand alone resort with no DVC. When they build AKV-Kidani they also converted a number of AKL rooms to DVC. A couple of notes about that:
- The configuration of the rooms at AKV-Jambo are slightly different than AKV-Kidani for the same room type. That's because they had a fixed area to convert at AKV-Jambo and had to lay the rooms out a little differently. I would assume that they would do the same at Wilderness Lodge.
- At AKV-Jambo, they included a few Concierge Level rooms in the conversion to DVC and they created a whole new booking category for Kilimanjaro Club Level (Concierge) for studios, 1BR and 2BR villas.
At AKV, it appears the conversion was done due to lower occupancy issues at Jambo. Wilderness Lodge is similar in that it is also a Deluxe Resort but has reported occupancy issues. I think both resorts (designed by the same architect) have a very strong appeal to a dedicated group, but the majority of WDW visitors don't put them on the same level as the monorail resorts or BC/YC. This is reflected in the pricing for rooms.
I'd have to think that converting rooms to DVC should be a win-win for Disney. If the current resort rooms continually run at a somewhat lower occupancy rate, then this would generate a cash influx to offset the lack of full occupancy. And the other aspect is that we as VWL owners would then be picking up a higher percentage of all the shared fees (front desk, bell services, general area maintenance, etc) that WL & VWL split.
Bottom line....it makes WL more profitable (reduced costs) and assuming they can sell the points, Disney wouldn't have to wait long to recoup their construction costs plus a nice profit.
Personally, I think the conversion rumor has some validity for the reasons cited above. It really doesn't have much impact on us other than giving us more rooms to go after at the 11 month mark and more options. Concierge could be fun to do (once).