twinklebug
Home is where the heart is.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2005
- Messages
- 9,639
I, for one, remain disappointed in that the "short cut" impacts the enjoyment for 2-3 years of existing owners and feel it's actually a large price we pay in that way.![]()
Thank you for pointing this out. This construction goes far beyond normal maintenance than just scaffolding to fix the exterior or cracked pool would have on the resort. I doubt the number crunchers have taken this into account as it is simply an intangible to them.
By my account, this is the first time Disney has made large scale modifications to an existing DVC. Closest to it would be adding of more buildings to SSR as they were selling, but even then the owners were well aware that the resort was not completed. The addition of the treehouses to SSR was a large job too, but in that they were isolated off to their wooded area it was minimal owner impact.
Disney is always pushing to do things in new ways - hopefully this experiment will be a total success from the owner's point of view as well as Disney's.
Last edited: