HaleyB
I am not a robot
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2003
- Messages
- 6,912
Originally posted by Lewisc
You're reading too much into my post. I am agreeing with OP. Using a voucher for meals in the restaurant I normally patronize, the way I normally order wouldn't save much money. I'll frequently skip dessert in favor of having dessert later in the evening. I understand that's a big no-no if you're using a voucher.
The word "loophole" doesn't have a bad meaning. I'm simply indicating the pro-voucher people have done a good job finding the places that seem to be allowing people to over order. Sorry, I consider being allowed to order the KS with one voucher a "loophole" that has since been closed. Children ordering off an adult menu while using an adult voucher is a "loophole". Nothing wrong with doing it since it's currently allowed. People are free to use these "loopholes" but there really isn't much recourse if and when these "loopholes" are closed.
People who don't intend to use these techniques will probably not get much benefit from the vouchers.
Sorry you don't like people giving a contrary opinion.
Ya know I didn't find the word loophole offensive, but I think you are wrong on one count... it is not that some "places that seem to be allowing people to over order"
It is some places are a better deal. Nobody claims to be able to order the 'for two' items like the larger desserts at Beaches anymore (maybe a year or more ago some people claimed they did), they combine two vouchers to do this. If you look at the menus for the places people find to be a good value you will see a number of items in the $7.99 and up range add a drink to that and you have already reached the break even point. Also you are mixing up the Lunch and the Q&C vouchers, or at least you are jumping between the two in your examples.

