sam_gordon
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
- Messages
- 28,553
The past couple years we've had fully electronic polls. Rotate a wheel to select the candidate, press 'Enter'. The screen would then go on to the next race. There was ALWAYS a line because some people "got it", others didn't and were slow.
This year, they hand me a paper ballot, but there was a machine off to the side. I asked and they said the machine was for handicapped people. On the paper ballot, you filled in the square next to the candidate, then take your sheet to a 'scanner', slide it in, and it records your vote. I started thinking "this is a step back", but as I drove off ~5 minutes after I parked, I realized it actually sped things up.
With the machines only, everyone was forced to wait while people did their thing. Like I mentioned before, some people could be slow, whether because they haven't made up their choice yet or they didn't understand how to use the machine.
With the 'fill in the box' ballot, I knew who I was voting for, it took less than a minute to fill out, and I put it through the scanner and walked out. It actually seemed MORE efficient (when it comes to time). I'm guessing the original ballot that I filled out is kept in the machine so if there is some question they can do a manual count.
I think the last presidential election, it took me 30 minutes to vote. This time less than 5. And that's hitting the poll location at approximately the same time.
ETA: the way they were set up, 6-8 people could be filling out their ballot at the same time. Their were cardboard shields so you couldn't see what your neighbor was doing. Someone taking their time wouldn't hold up someone who knew who they were voting for.
This year, they hand me a paper ballot, but there was a machine off to the side. I asked and they said the machine was for handicapped people. On the paper ballot, you filled in the square next to the candidate, then take your sheet to a 'scanner', slide it in, and it records your vote. I started thinking "this is a step back", but as I drove off ~5 minutes after I parked, I realized it actually sped things up.
With the machines only, everyone was forced to wait while people did their thing. Like I mentioned before, some people could be slow, whether because they haven't made up their choice yet or they didn't understand how to use the machine.
With the 'fill in the box' ballot, I knew who I was voting for, it took less than a minute to fill out, and I put it through the scanner and walked out. It actually seemed MORE efficient (when it comes to time). I'm guessing the original ballot that I filled out is kept in the machine so if there is some question they can do a manual count.
I think the last presidential election, it took me 30 minutes to vote. This time less than 5. And that's hitting the poll location at approximately the same time.
ETA: the way they were set up, 6-8 people could be filling out their ballot at the same time. Their were cardboard shields so you couldn't see what your neighbor was doing. Someone taking their time wouldn't hold up someone who knew who they were voting for.
So I am A-OK with paper ballots!
