Maybe not .90 cents but sellers would be foolish to ask .65 cents.
As cseca points out, the primary reasons BLT resales settled in the $90s were the poor state of the economy and the fact that
DVC's lowest offering price was around $93 per point.
Today the economy is much better than it was in 2009 and the lowest VGF offering price will be $145.
You are correct that many buyers are overextended. But that will also play a role in asking prices. A buyer who puts 10% down on VGF and finances at 11.5% will not be paying down the principle quickly. On a 200 pt purchase, the buyer will still owe $22,900 on the loan, or $114.50 per point. Factor in broker commission and they'll need to get $127 per point just to walk away.
In terms of size, a better parallel to VGF is the Grand Californian. VGC started selling in January 2009--4.5 years ago. Today if you peruse the reseller listings you won't find more than a half-dozen contracts and most of those are sale pending. Asking prices range from $115-125. Relative scarcity of VGF contracts should help resale prices for that resort, too.
Five years ago, it was commonplace for the disparity between direct and resale prices to be in the $15 per point neighborhood. The glut of contracts hitting the market during the recession, combined with DVC's overbuilding at SSR and AKV pushed prices to new lows. But that phenomenon will not necessarily repeat itself.
You said nobody would pay .90 cents on the dollar for VGF in a few years. My question is why WOULDN'T they?? If 2015 rolls around and DVC is asking upward of $160 per point, why wouldn't someone buy a resale contract for $135-140? The banked / borrowed point status of the contract will play a role. But if the resale contract is relatively equal to what DVC offers, those prices will still save $4000-5000 off of direct prices on a 200 pt contract. There should absolutely be buyers at that rate. The convenience of buying direct isn't worth $4-5k.