thelionqueen
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2005
- Messages
- 5,384
Pretty much! Anyone who’s ever been on it knows…But Disneyland is the happiest place on earth. MK is the most magical place on earth. Does the happiness die on harbor too?
Pretty much! Anyone who’s ever been on it knows…But Disneyland is the happiest place on earth. MK is the most magical place on earth. Does the happiness die on harbor too?
I get that many are OK with staying offsite..but you cannot compare the difference vs staying onsite. The Disney “bubble” is more important at DLR than at WDW.
It would be really tough competition against the studios next door who sleep 5 with two showers.
1) Magic Kingdom might as well be on Mars as far as I am concerned. I went once and appreciate WDW for what it is, but I’d rather go to Hawai’i for the cost of airfare/flight time and take a 2hr flight to DLand for my Disney fix.But Disneyland is the happiest place on earth. MK is the most magical place on earth. Does the happiness die on harbor too?
I've done both Many times. A hotel within a block (off Harbor) can be a shorter walk and sooo much easier parking the car. You can see the Disneyland sign from other hotels on your walk to the front gate - little to no "loss of bubble" time. Grand Californian is nice for DCA access - but still a pain to park. Some nearby hotels include a decent breakfast - not a financial deal breaker, but makes rope drop Way easier for us.Staying offsite is a total no go for most. It’s a completely different vacation vs staying at the 2 flagship resorts
It much more affordable, but dealing with homeless people, street racing, and people trying to hoc their wares is a completely different vacation that walking back to Grand Cal and other Disney properties.I've done both Many times. A hotel within a block (off Harbor) can be a shorter walk and sooo much easier parking the car. You can see the Disneyland sign from other hotels on your walk to the front gate - little to no "loss of bubble" time. Grand Californian is nice for DCA access - but still a pain to park. Some nearby hotels include a decent breakfast - not a financial deal breaker, but makes rope drop Way easier for us.
You're not wrong. I'm still fine staying nearby on Harbor even after the Creepy Bible and Bullhorn Guy yelled that people going to Disney were going to Hell - guess I have a thicker skin, than walletDowntown Disney > Harbor Blvd
We all have a limited amount of resources and should utilize them in whatever way we feel maximizes our long term happiness.You're not wrong. I'm still fine staying nearby on Harbor even after the Creepy Bible and Bullhorn Guy yelled that people going to Disney were going to Hell - guess I have a thicker skin, than wallet![]()
But the filings last week showed an extra full bathroom in 1 and 2 bedrooms. Big selling point.It would be really tough competition against the studios next door who sleep 5 with two showers.
ShhhhhhhhhI brought Porto's with me so I can really imagine what my stay might feel like in the next year or so.![]()
For VDH, if we say it is $230 per point, divided by 50 years then you are paying $4.60 per point each year. $4.6 + $9.06 dues= $13.66pp. To stay at VDH in a preferred view studio last night was 24 points or $328 before tax.
I know one can find less expensive accommodations on Harbor… but given the stress we put ourselves through at work so that we can maintain a middle class lifestyle and have enough discretionary income to afford vacations like Disney…. I still think there is a lot of “value” in staying on property at an extra ~$100ish a night vs a Harbor hotel.
I am neutralizing unknown variables to get a general idea for a luxury item. Back of the napkin math works just fine for me.This is the trick number one they teach at "how to scam people into buying a timeshare" training.
Dividing by the total number of years means you're giving the same values to dollars in 2023 as in 2073. You're discounting inflation and opportunity cost.
Couldn’t disagree more..but that’s why there are options for all. What you consider loss of bubble time I consider unfathomable. Yes they’re close, yes easier to park, NO not comfortable or safe or clean or kept up..but they are within inches of homeless sleeping on your path, violence, over crowding, drag racing and on and on. Just not for meI've done both Many times. A hotel within a block (off Harbor) can be a shorter walk and sooo much easier parking the car. You can see the Disneyland sign from other hotels on your walk to the front gate - little to no "loss of bubble" time. Grand Californian is nice for DCA access - but still a pain to park. Some nearby hotels include a decent breakfast - not a financial deal breaker, but makes rope drop Way easier for us.
I will say that the Westin looks very nice and there is a lit walkway to get over there that does not involve walking down Harbor.Couldn’t disagree more..but that’s why there are options for all. What you consider loss of bubble time I consider unfathomable. Yes they’re close, yes easier to park, NO not comfortable or safe or clean or kept up..but they are within inches of homeless sleeping on your path, violence, over crowding, drag racing and on and on. Just not for me
Yeesh, I love pretty much any Disney resort, and definitely adore DLH, but I think you may not have had a lot of stays at WDW resorts. Many have very beautiful grounds. Walking around Grand Floridian with the building lit up, Seven Seas Lagoon reflecting the lights, and Cinderella's Castle in the distance... very magical. Same with the Poly with the tiki torches lit up... the Boardwalk area is awesome... seeing giraffes outside your window at AKL... even moderates like Coronado Springs have lovely and amazingly themed grounds. WDW hotels actually have grounds thanks to all the space.1000%
Yet the grounds of DLH & GCV is more magical than most WDW resorts. Gotta spend the $ where it counts imo