Ummm..not for nothing, but hep b is transmitted through sexual contact and blood, not much chance for a child to get that...which is why I didn't have my new born infant get that shot. I did however, make sure my DS's when they were 18 get that shot, that was not available when they were kids. But since they were sexually active they were at risk.
On the other hand, my 2 youngest get the flu shots every year, and they did get the chicken pox vaccine. Heck, I would have been first on line for that shot, if my older boys didn't get it and give it to me in my 30's.
I understand you want to play devil's advocate, but your child has a hugh risk of getting the chicken pox and the flu and practically no chance of hep b. And the chicken pox is HORRIBLE...it really is bad, and I so wish the vaccine came out years before it did!!
I completely agree with you about the chicken pox vaccination. I was on the fence about getting it for my sons. But, when my son was 10 months old I developed an extremely painful rash on my back and under my breast. Turns out I had shingles (an extremely painful infection that can occur in people who have had chicken pox)! It was so painful, for four weeks I was on opiate based pain medication and I missed two weeks of work (I'm a nurse).
After my pedi explained that children who are vaccinated against chicken pox will also not be susceptible to shingles I was on board. Both of my sons are fully vaccinated.
I'm wondering why several posters have mentioned not wanting the Prevnar vaccine? Pneumococcal disease is a major killer of children in developing countries and can cause meningitis and recurrent ear infections. Is there a controversy with this vaccine (like the MMR)? Or is it just that it is newer?