I don't believe the Top of the World Lounge access is technically listed as a "Member" perk. From the time the resort opened it was marketed more as a perk available to anyone staying at BLT on a reservation made through Member Services.
My understanding is that point stays qualify as well as cash rooms booked through MS. Both members and non-members staying on those reservations can visit the lounge. There was never any distinction made between owners/guests/renters which would disqualify certain individuals.
I don't believe the Top of the World Lounge access is technically listed as a "Member" perk. From the time the resort opened it was marketed more as a perk available to anyone staying at BLT on a reservation made through Member Services.
My understanding is that point stays qualify as well as cash rooms booked through MS. Both members and non-members staying on those reservations can visit the lounge. There was never any distinction made between owners/guests/renters which would disqualify certain individuals.
So, I think that the CM running the desk decide how to enforce the rules so if a blue membership card is required at that particular instant, a renter would be out of luck.
Due to anticipated high demand for this location, access is available only to Disney Vacation Club Members who are staying at Bay Lake Tower using their Membership (Vacation Points or cash), guests staying in the room with that Member, and guests who are staying in a room reserved by a DVC Member with Vacation Points. Access is limited and available on a first-come, first-served basis.
This is true. But, it almost never happens. Naturally, most landlords "forget" to identify their renters as such, because doing so only reduces the value of the reservation.But if you are renting the reservation, the member should notify DVC and it would not say DVC member.
David, I think there have been "issues" relating to the Grand Computer Unification. That said, I have had stays mis-coded in the past. Not common, but it has happened. For example, I had an II exchange a few years ago that was coded as a Member stay, when it should not have been.
David, I think there have been "issues" relating to the Grand Computer Unification. That said, I have had stays mis-coded in the past. Not common, but it has happened. For example, I had an II exchange a few years ago that was coded as a Member stay, when it should not have been.