tlbwriter said:
the man kept up a conversation with the cashier, apparently trying to distract her, as his wife handed over a big stack of coupons.
This can also result in grocery items not being scanned, or, with improved training, the cashier, if unsure whether she did not scan an item, will scan it (perhaps for the second time) or if unsure whether she already scanned a coupon, will not scan it (again).
I just noticed this in your post- can you imagine if J'aime had to pay the out of pocket $1900 then settle for the coupons to be deducted at the secondary screening? That would be a show. I know most of the time it would be a small reimbursement- a few bucks for one or multiples of the same coupons- but visualizing her face falling while she had to say that she couldn't afford the 4 wagonloads made my day!
I am guessing that only about $300. worth of coupons would have failed to scan so she would have to pay $400. instead of her expected $100. and only a small portion of the stack of coupons would have needed to be analyzed.
leight said:
At my publix- I hand them the coupons at the beginning and I have it segregated by store coupons, competitor and lastly manufacturer-free items are always last on my line of items so they can write them in easily. That way the cashier can check them as they ring it up.
But still the cashier has to:
Take item #1,
eyeball all of the coupons for a match, scan the item.
Take item #2,
eyeball all of the coupons for a match, scan the item. Let's say a coupon was matched so scan the coupon.
Take item #3,
eyeball all of the remaining coupons for a match, scan the item.
Etc.
Lots of time is consumed performing the steps in red.
Hmmm. How about requiring that each coupon be placed on or under the item it goes with? The customer still has the option of having all the coupons scanned at the end but then if a coupon is rejected, no further analysis is done on the spot and the customer has to pay the full price.
OT: The preceding is similar to a situation that a club I belong to ran into. The club passed a resolution regarding membership that (long story short) required that we find out which members were on List A only, which members were on List B only, and which members were on both lists, and there were numerous spelling errors and maiden/hyphenated name issues. So someone had to either take names one at a time from List A and check against List B, or take names one at a time from List B and check against List A. No one wanted to do that task and the passed resolution was not carried out!
cm8 said:
If you do have the correct items and it is just unreadable, a cashier has to verify that you have the correct items and have a manger come over and override the system once he/she has already verified it as well ...
A computer system is needed that also prints the coupon savings amount next to each item listed so no one can fool even the manager by submitting a third coupon for the same two item.