GrnMtnMan
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2008
- Messages
- 2,408
How does DVC justify denying two particular perks to non-member DVC point renters? Specifically, access to the Top of The World Lounge and Internet access.
Here's my thinking. As an owner, you purchased the right to occupy units in DVC resorts and to use the common amenities owned and maintained by those resorts - like I can use the pool, electricity, water, elevators, TVs, and telephones - why not internet? Is there a clause in your contract that says that certain entitlements will not transfer to occupants other than the owner? Or a clause that separately classifies 'occupants other than the owner for which the owner receives compensation' in a unique category?
Now that the TOTWL is part of the common amenities of the BLT, rather than owned by DVD, shouldn't any access granted to DVC owners be transferred to the occupant of that owner's unit? And shouldn't internet access, which (I've been lead to believe) BLT owners pay for in there maintenance fees, be transferred to whomever a DVC owner chooses to occupy his ownership interest during his/her ownership interval? The only way I could see this being legal is if the original purchase documents have categorization for occupants who compensated an owner. So is there such a clause?
And I understand the difference between perks that DVD offered to people who purchased their DVC interest from DVD.
Background: I own a timeshare at Harborside at Atlantis, and I'm a bit of a real estate wonk (I work in commercial real estate). So I've actually read a good part of my ownership documents. There's clear definition in my documents that whoever I choose to occupy my unity during my ownership interest will be treated as if they were me. This is very important at Atlantis because it means that the access to Atlantis that I am entitled to transfers to my unit's occupants. Which means that when you rent a unit at Harborside, your access to everything at Atlantis is already included.
Thanks if you've read this far. I'm really curious if DVC really has a special category for owners, or if DVD just did a really good job of marketing that idea to DVC buyers.
Here's my thinking. As an owner, you purchased the right to occupy units in DVC resorts and to use the common amenities owned and maintained by those resorts - like I can use the pool, electricity, water, elevators, TVs, and telephones - why not internet? Is there a clause in your contract that says that certain entitlements will not transfer to occupants other than the owner? Or a clause that separately classifies 'occupants other than the owner for which the owner receives compensation' in a unique category?
Now that the TOTWL is part of the common amenities of the BLT, rather than owned by DVD, shouldn't any access granted to DVC owners be transferred to the occupant of that owner's unit? And shouldn't internet access, which (I've been lead to believe) BLT owners pay for in there maintenance fees, be transferred to whomever a DVC owner chooses to occupy his ownership interest during his/her ownership interval? The only way I could see this being legal is if the original purchase documents have categorization for occupants who compensated an owner. So is there such a clause?
And I understand the difference between perks that DVD offered to people who purchased their DVC interest from DVD.
Background: I own a timeshare at Harborside at Atlantis, and I'm a bit of a real estate wonk (I work in commercial real estate). So I've actually read a good part of my ownership documents. There's clear definition in my documents that whoever I choose to occupy my unity during my ownership interest will be treated as if they were me. This is very important at Atlantis because it means that the access to Atlantis that I am entitled to transfers to my unit's occupants. Which means that when you rent a unit at Harborside, your access to everything at Atlantis is already included.
Thanks if you've read this far. I'm really curious if DVC really has a special category for owners, or if DVD just did a really good job of marketing that idea to DVC buyers.