FantasticDisFamily
<font color=navy>Sent <font color=red>on a <font c
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2002
- Messages
- 3,061
Disneykidds posed several interesting questions in another thread and I mentioned I would take those into one of my management courses and see what sort of response the students had.
I have all freshmen/sophomores this semester so keep that in mind (although it did provide excellent talking points regarding gap analysis in their skill set, etc. but I digress).
Essentially they felt what happens to Eisner depends on the vote 3/3/04. If the stockholders vote ME off the board then the board should remove him as CEO.
None of them thought the possibility of a no vote would be enough incentive to persuade him to leave before that. Let me just insert here that the surrounding conversation indicated very little understanding of the sort of ego required to be in such a position in the first place. In fact most of them keyed in on why would someone not old enough to retire (?) leave before they were 62/65 unless forced to. Ok, another gap is that they don't comprehend how much money a CEO pulls in, they are thinking from a paycheck to paycheck until one can collect Social Security/pension standpoint.
Procurement of the Muppet rights was generally seen as an indication that ME still has Disney's "best interests" in mind.
There was difficulty getting past the gut response and supporting their positions. Which of course gave me an awesome opportunity to discuss the important of developing critical thinking and analysis skills along with the assignments that are used to do that!
So there you have it for what it is worth. We will continue to follow this situation through the semester. Stockholders meeting takes place during our spring break but I have told them to pay attention anyway.
Deb
I have all freshmen/sophomores this semester so keep that in mind (although it did provide excellent talking points regarding gap analysis in their skill set, etc. but I digress).
Essentially they felt what happens to Eisner depends on the vote 3/3/04. If the stockholders vote ME off the board then the board should remove him as CEO.
None of them thought the possibility of a no vote would be enough incentive to persuade him to leave before that. Let me just insert here that the surrounding conversation indicated very little understanding of the sort of ego required to be in such a position in the first place. In fact most of them keyed in on why would someone not old enough to retire (?) leave before they were 62/65 unless forced to. Ok, another gap is that they don't comprehend how much money a CEO pulls in, they are thinking from a paycheck to paycheck until one can collect Social Security/pension standpoint.

Procurement of the Muppet rights was generally seen as an indication that ME still has Disney's "best interests" in mind.
There was difficulty getting past the gut response and supporting their positions. Which of course gave me an awesome opportunity to discuss the important of developing critical thinking and analysis skills along with the assignments that are used to do that!
So there you have it for what it is worth. We will continue to follow this situation through the semester. Stockholders meeting takes place during our spring break but I have told them to pay attention anyway.
Deb