Sponsorship of Epcot's Test Track stuck in neutral

wbk

Mouseketeer
Joined
Aug 19, 1999
Messages
124
The Epcot attraction remains uncertain as GM and Disney executives negotiate a possible contract extension.

By Jason Garcia

Sentinel Staff Writer

June 22, 2009


Three weeks after General Motors Corp. filed for bankruptcy -- and nearly three months after an internal deadline to resolve the issue -- the carmaker's status as sponsor of one of Walt Disney World's marquee attractions remains uncertain.

Executives for GM and Disney have continued to negotiate a possible contract extension to keep the beleaguered Detroit auto giant as sponsor of Epcot's Test Track. But so far nothing has been announced.

Neither side is talking, at least publicly. "We have nothing new to share," Disney spokeswoman Andrea Finger said recently.

A spokeswoman for GM did not return messages seeking comment.

The sponsorship of Test Track, a high-speed ride that carries guests through a series of simulated car-safety tests, has been the subject of speculation for months. GM's 10-year contract is thought to have expired at the end of March — which is also the public deadline GM had originally set for negotiating an extension.

GM has said it wants to remain Test Track's sponsor. But it is an expensive proposition for a company that this month became the second-largest industrial bankruptcy in U.S. history.

GM paid Disney $100 million for the sponsorship, according to a person familiar with the contract. The deal was front-loaded: GM paid nearly all of its sponsorship fees during the first five years of the 10-year pact, said the person, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on behalf of either company.

GM also spends between $1 million and $2 million a year operating a post-ride showroom inside the attraction, with more than a dozen vehicles on display and terminals that guests can use to order sales brochures.

The company's contract-extension talks with Disney have been further complicated by the involvement of the federal government, which has kept GM afloat with tens of billions of dollars in loans and is about to become majority owner of the iconic company. Some worry the company could face a public backlash if it is seen as using taxpayer money to underwrite a theme-park ride.

Still, the marketing appeal is obvious. Test Track — among the biggest draws in a theme park that lures 11 million customers each year — gives GM a unique platform from which to build goodwill for its brands.

Since March, rumors have circulated around Epcot that Disney was permitting GM to stay on a month-to-month basis while negotiations continued.

The person familiar with the contract, who said he had been briefed on the talks, said GM and Disney were poised to sign a six-month contract extension just days before the carmaker's June 1 bankruptcy filing. The deal would have allowed GM to forgo paying Disney a sponsorship fee but would have required it to continue paying for the post-ride showroom.

The agreement would have ensured that GM remained Test Track's sponsor through the end of 2009 — and spared both the carmaker and Disney the expense of erasing GM's presence from the attraction.

It's not clear, however, whether such an agreement was signed. Disney would not discuss the talks in any detail.

A sponsorship change any time soon appears unlikely. Experts say finding another car company to replace GM will be difficult for Disney, as the entire auto industry has been hammered by the global recession. Any new sponsor would also likely have to spend a significant amount of money to update and re-theme Test Track.

"We find it difficult to believe another manufacturer would be able to rationalize such an expensive partnership in today's environment," Richard Greenfield, an analyst at the stock-research firm Pali Capital, wrote in a blog post earlier this year.

Two of the companies often rumored as potential Test Track sponsors — Toyota and Honda — both said they were not interested.

"We have no plans to sponsor that," said Marcos Frommer, spokesman for American Honda Motor Co.

Added Toyota Motor Sales USA spokesman Joe Tetherow: "This is something that's not even on the radar."

A representative for Ford did not return a phone message.

While the fees at stake are a relatively minor amount for the Walt Disney Co., Greenfield said they are an example of the varied ways the recession has squeezed the Burbank, Calif.-based company.

Sponsorship uncertainty "illustrates how the economic meltdown is impacting aspects of Disney's businesses that we had not even thought about previously," he wrote.
 
If anyone remembers Rocket Rods, which had a brief stint in Disneyland California, part of the reason it closed is because a tire company [I can't remember which one] dropped its sponsorship of replacing the rides tires. I don't know how fast Test Track goes through tires if it does at all, but this could be a potential problem for the long-term future of this ride. I think this ride is popular enough that someone will pick it up.
 
I think this ride is popular enough that someone will pick it up.
If you read the article above it states that it is one of the most popular rides at the park and draws in over 11,000,000 visitors per year. The problem getting a new sponsor isn't with the popularity of the ride its maybe overall problems with our economy. In good times sponsors would be clamoring to sponsor it.
 
I would say revamp it in some way, get it more in line with Future World and go a new direction with new sponsor. There are plenty of wealthy, forward thinking companies that might back something like this.
 

I wonder just how much "goodwill" Test Track has actually gotten for Goverment--oops I mean General--Motors??
Every time we ride Test Track we--and almost everyone else--waste no time in that post-ride showroom.
So has anyone ever ridden Test Track and come out just absolutely DYING to own a new GM car??
 
I wonder just how much "goodwill" Test Track has actually gotten for Goverment--oops I mean General--Motors??
Every time we ride Spaceship Earth we--and almost everyone else--waste no time in that post-ride showroom.
So has anyone ever ridden Spaceship Earth and come out just absolutely DYING to own a new GM car??


I don't stop in the showroom, but every time we walk through, there always seems to be people looking at the cars. With the gift shop right there and bathrooms close by, I bet they get a lot of people hanging around looking at cars while they wait for someone else in their group. What that actually does for GM, I have no idea. But even if just a small fraction of the people that ride Test Track stop and look at the cars, that is still a huge number of people.
 
If you read the article above it states that it is one of the most popular rides at the park and draws in over 11,000,000 visitors per year. The problem getting a new sponsor isn't with the popularity of the ride its maybe overall problems with our economy. In good times sponsors would be clamoring to sponsor it.

11,000,000???? No wonder it's so @&+$#! hard to get on that thing without a FP!
 
I wonder just how much "goodwill" Test Track has actually gotten for Goverment--oops I mean General--Motors??
Every time we ride Spaceship Earth we--and almost everyone else--waste no time in that post-ride showroom.
So has anyone ever ridden Spaceship Earth and come out just absolutely DYING to own a new GM car??

I have owned GM cars since 1988 - does that count?
 
If anyone remembers Rocket Rods, which had a brief stint in Disneyland California, part of the reason it closed is because a tire company [I can't remember which one] dropped its sponsorship of replacing the rides tires. I don't know how fast Test Track goes through tires if it does at all, but this could be a potential problem for the long-term future of this ride. I think this ride is popular enough that someone will pick it up.

Goodyear provided the tires (and also for the PeopleMover for many years before that), but IIRC RocketRods had numerous problems, one of which was the ridiculous wear on the tires that necessitated them being replaced in less than a week of use - far, far worse than anticipated. RocketRods accelerated and decelerated a lot (because they wouldn't bank the turns), covering the PeopleMover track in something like a fifth of the time the PeopleMover did, which wore out a lot of things faster that they expected.

Trivia: Goodyear sponsored the PeopleMover (and provided the drive tires in the track) when one of the Big 3 auto makers (I think it was Ford) didn't want to sponsor an attraction that made the car obsolete...
 
Goodyear provided the tires (and also for the PeopleMover for many years before that), but IIRC RocketRods had numerous problems, one of which was the ridiculous wear on the tires that necessitated them being replaced in less than a week of use - far, far worse than anticipated. RocketRods accelerated and decelerated a lot (because they wouldn't bank the turns), covering the PeopleMover track in something like a fifth of the time the PeopleMover did, which wore out a lot of things faster that they expected.

Trivia: Goodyear sponsored the PeopleMover (and provided the drive tires in the track) when one of the Big 3 auto makers (I think it was Ford) didn't want to sponsor an attraction that made the car obsolete...

That is correct, it was Ford. They created the original PeopleMover style system for the 1964 World's Fair...Ford Pavilion where people rode actual Ford cars through a peoplemover-like attraction.
 
I wonder just how much "goodwill" Test Track has actually gotten for Goverment--oops I mean General--Motors??
Every time we ride Spaceship Earth we--and almost everyone else--waste no time in that post-ride showroom.
So has anyone ever ridden Spaceship Earth and come out just absolutely DYING to own a new GM car??

Did I miss something, is GM now in Spaceship Earth too? I thought it was just Esurance animation :rotfl:
 
Nope--you didn't miss anything. Just me typing w/o thinking!!

But I'd only suggest that if all things were equal and GM had their own (not the taxpaying publics) $$$ to throw around, sponsering TT would be good. But all things aren't equal now and I can see lots of folks getting mad if they did re-sponser.
Only GM knows (I guess) how many cars they sold as a direct result of people riding TT. Evidently tho, it wasn't enough to keep them in business:)
 
Today GM announced all the sponsorship contract it was dropping under their bankruptcy plan. I have heard they dropped some NASCAR and other sports related things but have not heard anything of their Disney Test Track sponsorship status yet. Anyone hear anything?
 
Is it only me, or perhaps does Disney already have the replacement for test track mapped out in a Cars sequal. The below link is from their 2006 annual report. Does Carland look like test track or can they make it work?

http://corporate.disney.go.com/investors/annual_reports/2006/int/dint.html

Right now, this Carland Test-Track-type ride is slated for California Adventure. It's similar, but I have some doubts on how the Cars theme will fit into Future World if Disney decides to change Test Track.
 
Right now, this Carland Test-Track-type ride is slated for California Adventure. It's similar, but I have some doubts on how the Cars theme will fit into Future World if Disney decides to change Test Track.

How does Nemo fit in Future World? I love all the Pixar movies, but just don't think they belong in Epcot. I hope Test Track does not change to Cars.
 


Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE


New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom