When we went somewhere, it was where my parents wanted to go. Nothing wrong with that as they earned money and I didn't!!
After six pages of this thread, I am still having a hard time with this whole "The one with the gold rules" concept. My DW is a SAH mom who does volunteer work. I make all the money. Not in a million years would I consider playing the: "I make the money, so I make the decisions" card with her. And if I wouldn't do it with her, I wouldn't do it with my DD. I really think that the whole bread winner argument is extraneous to the discussion. If not, then that level of authority could be wielded against one's non-earning spouse. I doubt that happens all that often. The real issue is the parent-child dynamic. Not the income earner vs. non income earner dynamic.
Well, I guess since the parents make the money they get to decide the trips.
My DD wants to go there too!! She says that will be her next vacation pick (next year). If kids are actually interested in that kind of stuff it would be such a shame to let that enthusiasm go to waste.
After six pages of this thread, I am still having a hard time with this whole "The one with the gold rules" concept. My DW is a SAH mom who does volunteer work. I make all the money. Not in a million years would I consider playing the: "I make the money, so I make the decisions" card with her. And if I wouldn't do it with her, I wouldn't do it with my DD. I really think that the whole bread winner argument is extraneous to the discussion. If not, then that level of authority could be wielded against one's non-earning spouse. I doubt that happens all that often. The real issue is the parent-child dynamic. Not the income earner vs. non income earner dynamic.
Sorry. I don't get this at all. This smacks of pure Disney myopia. Are you telling me that after ten consecutive years of going to WDW, if your kids came to you and said:
"Dad, we are studying U.S. history and we'd really like to go to Boston, Philadelphia, or Williamsburg for vacation this year",
or
"Dad, we are really interested in the arts, and we'd like to go to Paris to see the Louvre", you would say: "Suck it up Buttercup. I'm paying and we're going to Epcot and you can see France there and watch Ben Franklin and Mark Twain teach you about history!"
Part of parenting is teaching. If your kids want to expand their horizons, you have an obligation to foster their growth. It's called being a parent. Even if it inconveniences your annual trip to spin on the Tea Cups. Honestly. Only on a Disney chat board would you find such a: "I ain't letting my kids' preferences get in the way of my Disney fun" attitude.
My DD wants to go there too!! She says that will be her next vacation pick (next year). If kids are actually interested in that kind of stuff it would be such a shame to let that enthusiasm go to waste.
Hubby and I have had this discussion. Although I am Disney obsessed, he is not. We have agreed to one more trip and then a 5 year break to go to other places. The kids will have to just go where we go. They really don't have a choice in what we do until they are old enough to go on there own, and pay for it on there own. However where ever we go we try to incorporate things that they like. No trip is fun if the kids are complaining the whole time. If you are close to these friends maybe you should initiate a group trip and show them that there is more to the world than just Disney, Or sit your friend down and have a heart to heart about the situation. You know there is always one other alternative, Plan a weekend trip for just the disney obsessed and call it Friend time.
After six pages of this thread, I am still having a hard time with this whole "The one with the gold rules" concept. My DW is a SAH mom who does volunteer work. I make all the money. Not in a million years would I consider playing the: "I make the money, so I make the decisions" card with her. And if I wouldn't do it with her, I wouldn't do it with my DD. I really think that the whole bread winner argument is extraneous to the discussion. If not, then that level of authority could be wielded against one's non-earning spouse. I doubt that happens all that often. The real issue is the parent-child dynamic. Not the income earner vs. non income earner dynamic.
No, actually, it's since the parents are the adults and the persons responsible for making decisions for the individuals in the family, the parents choose the vacation destinations.Well, I guess since the parents make the money they get to decide the trips.
chloe4ever said:It just seems like the Disney fanatics who defend the parents who do this just cannot possible imagine a kid not wanting to go to Disney 15 years in a row and mock the kids for that. Kids do, shockingly, have other interests outside of Disney and it is not sad when they want to go somewhere else.
Seriously? They don't need an intervention. It's nobody's business but their own. The OP needs to just stay out of it. There is no "situation" that needs to be addressed.
No, actually, it's since the parents are the adults and the persons responsible for making decisions for the individuals in the family, the parents choose the vacation destinations.
"Mom, I'm tired of you never letting me run with scissors; I'm going to do it from now on!"
"You're not me. I'll go to bed when I'm tired! Not my fault I'm late for school every day!"
"dad, you always tell me I can't drink beer. I'm making my own decisions now!"
So if the parents are obsessed with wine and took their kids along to Napa and Sonoma for winery visits, and the kids had to hang around the tasting room parking lots while the parents tasted wine all day; and they did this 15 years in a row, and the kids said one year: "This year, just ONCE, we'd like to go to Disney World", your response would be: "Shut your pie hole. We're going wine tasting"? Somehow I get the sense that if the jumping off point of this thread had been that the parents refused to go to WDW and the kids wanted to go, the collective wisdom of this board would take on a whole different perception of parental guidance and flexibility.Nothing at all to do with being Disney obsessed. Replace WDW with any destination and the response would be the same.
The adults, being the adults, make the - all decisions for the family. What's next? The tweens (and really, if that description is accurate we're talking about 11-12) get to pick the new car? The living room furniture? The house? The city where they live?
I think what we are forgetting is that the majority of americans vacation in the same place every year.
Citation, please. I don't know that the majority do this at all.
Also I think there is a big different between the parent choosing the destination and the parent dictating every aspect of the vacation. If the parent chose Disney every year, and then forced the teenagers to ride Small World on constant loop, then maybe I'd see why they were whining. I see your point, and it is a good one. BUT, there is a big difference between whining because you don't like something and expressing a desire to do something else. Take "whining" out of the equation. The kids could LOVE WDW. But after 15 consecutive years, they might want to try something new. Why can't the spirit of compromise and reason that was employed to get the kids into bluezoo instead of the Princess meal be employed to get the family to a mutually agreeable alternative destination altogether? Why does the discussion and solution only come about once they are already at WDW?
Has anyone thought that perhaps the kids cannot agree on where to vacation, so the parents just step in and make the decision? I know I've talked about how I would have liked to go to more historical sights and museums on vacation, but really, it wouldn't have just been my parents, my brothers would have hated every minute of it! They would have just wanted to go to the beach, which I don't like being very fair and prone to burning. So, we went where my parents wanted, it at least solved the fighting between siblings.
As it pertains to a particular family in question, you are correct. We are far from understanding the complete picture. I am only commenting in the abstract.
Sometimes its just easier for the parents to take charge and make the big decisions.
Somehow I get the sense that if the jumping off point of this thread had been that the parents refused to go to WDW and the kids wanted to go, the collective wisdom of this board would take on a whole different perception of parental guidance and flexibility.
I don't know for sure but I bet if the thread was about a family that only was allowed to vacation at Atlantis and the children were begging Mom and Dad to take them to Disney but Mom was obsessed with Atlantis the responses would be a tad different.
Looks like we're pretty much on the same page. Pretty sad when kids don't get to participate in the planning. I love asking my DD where she might like to eat when we are at the 180 day counting mark. Often, her answers surprise me and we go places I never would have expected. It's also great when she mentions one of my favorites as that reinforces what I have planned all these years. But if she ever said: "Let's do Carousel of Progress first and do Space Mountain later in the day", I'd have to pull rank!![]()