Some things I have been reading

Go watch "Forks over Knives" or "Food Inc." and you will never eat again. And if you think going vegan is helping these animals, think again. What do you think they do with the animals when they kick them off the soil needed to plant the vegetables?
 
I have been reading many comments around about how cruel SeaWorld is and the terrible captivity the animals are in. I've been to Sea world many times and I can say that is completely false. I feel like people who are saying this have only watched the newest documentary about this or have never been to SeaWorld. It kind of makes me angry to hear this about a park and company who work so hard to save and rehabilitate animals who need help

So basically peoples opinions are often shaped by their experiences and their convictions.

These are my thoughts and mine only. I am keeping them very general.

I am a scientist. I am that way by education and by trade. If there is one thing I know how to do, it is to search for information and to analyse it. So to say I feel a certain way because of one thing is false. at least in my case it is.

Now I come from a long line of activist. My mom was a civil rights attorney. she spent much of her youth fighting segregation in Tennse and help get minorities the right to vote in that state. My dad fought for this country, won two silver stars and then returned home only to find out he couldn't go see a movie because the theater in his home town was for whites only.
I've been raised to speak my mind and to protest.

The way I do my part is to use my power as a consumer because I firmly believe that the only time America makes any type of change is when it affects (or is it effects? I can never remember) it's pocket book. I'm sorry but I'm super cynical. I believe we would kill every animal on this planet if it benefited us. I believe we would chop down every single tree in this country, pollute every lake, stream and ocean if we thought it would get us cheap gas. Sea world is a corporate entity, their primary focus will always be to satisfy their shareholders. The health and well being of those animals will always be secondary.

so all that being said, you have a right to your anger but don't assume I for some reason don't know what I'm talking about. I have been to sea world, I will not go back nor support them with my dollars. I am one person making my decisions based on my convictions.

If that makes you angry, I can live with that.
 
Go watch "Forks over Knives" or "Food Inc." and you will never eat again. And if you think going vegan is helping these animals, think again. What do you think they do with the animals when they kick them off the soil needed to plant the vegetables?

What does being a vegetarian or vegan have to do with cetacean captivity?
What animals are being "kicked off the soil" for vegetable farming?

Maybe I don't I understand your point. Can you please clarify?
 
Some of SW's practices have been greatly exaggerated by the opposition, and some have not. Overall, I'm good with the whole thing. If allowing them to continue to breed captive whales creates any energy about the species among an otherwise non caring public, then I feel it's well worth it.

I think we've all witness tremendous advances in zoo enclosures in our lifetimes, and I believe we will continue to see even more as the years go on.
 

So for those that have researched on BOTH sides of this debate:

What can I read about Sea World and their animals that can just give me facts--no bias. I mean strictly Sea World, not other animal parks. Something that will tell me the good that Sea World does and the bad or questionable. Is there such an article? I would like to know that I am reading it from a point of view that is not that of an organization such as PETA nor from the pov of Sea World. Somewhere in the middle.
 
So for those that have researched on BOTH sides of this debate:

What can I read about Sea World and their animals that can just give me facts--no bias. I mean strictly Sea World, not other animal parks. Something that will tell me the good that Sea World does and the bad or questionable. Is there such an article? I would like to know that I am reading it from a point of view that is not that of an organization such as PETA nor from the pov of Sea World. Somewhere in the middle.

I wish I could recommend a few books or articles that would present both sides in a clear concise format. Unfortunately I can't. And unfortunately you will run into bias on both sides. Because you only want the data on Sea World I would Google search Sea World and their stance and responses to the debate. Sea World has a history of not going public with a lot of information. This is unfortunate but it's the truth. I have gathered my data and based my opinions on reading and researching for many years, but that includes all captivity programs, not just Sea World. I'm sure once you hit a good source for Sea World it will lead you to others.
Good resources for anti captivity arguments include: seashepherd.com, the dolphin project, earthislandinstitute, save the blood dolphins. I also do encourage you to see "Blackfish". And view it with an open mind, weighing both sides.
As far as PETA is concerned, I'm not a fan of many of the things they do. They have a very radical side that I do not agree with. But there are many other organizations that have the best interest of animals in their hearts and do good work without the shock effect. Many do this in relative silence. Those are the groups that I admire.
I am happy that you have decided to research both sides. It's the smart thing to do. And if you decide that you have no problem with captivity, I can absolutely respect that. As long as you gave both arguments a chance!
 
Dogs and other animals thrive off being "trained" and doing things to please their owners. Whose to say mammals don't thrive off of that too? Maybe its more enjoyable to them to do be trained to do tricks, always have calm waters to live in and food and treats CONSTANTLY given to them. Whose to say that this life is worse off then the one they had? Are we in their minds?

Would you go to a zoo then?


Zoos and aQuariums do a lot for the animals on this earth.

So keeping large orcas in captivity, reducing their life span to almost nothing, with a higher calf mortality than in the wild and driving them insane is good? They probably cant be released into the wild but they can stop breeding them. They take calfs from the mother when they are 1 yet in the wild they have been seen mouth feeding calves up to 4 so even that is unnatural. The best thing to do is retire the shows stop breeding them and let them die out naturally.
 
/
So for those that have researched on BOTH sides of this debate:

What can I read about Sea World and their animals that can just give me facts--no bias. I mean strictly Sea World, not other animal parks. Something that will tell me the good that Sea World does and the bad or questionable. Is there such an article? I would like to know that I am reading it from a point of view that is not that of an organization such as PETA nor from the pov of Sea World. Somewhere in the middle.

I think you're going to have a tough time finding an unbiased article one way or the other. Most animal rights people consider Seaworld to be hell on Earth while most Seaworld supporters consider Seaworld to be heaven on Earth.

What specifically good, bad and questionable are you looking to find out about Seaworld? Is it how the animals are cared for? Is it the living conditions of the animals? How the animals came to be at the park? Veterinary practices? The whales specifically?

Your best bet will probably be reading what people from both sides of the argument write on here. Because honestly, like a previous poster said, it's hard to form a true opinion unless you've researched the park like some of the posters on here have.

A previous poster listed a bunch of ideas of movies and text that you can read about the anti captivity point of view. Keep in mind that all the sources the poster listed are incredibly biased against Seaworld and are completely one sided to the argument.

Likewise, if you want completely one sided pro Seaworld links, I would check out any of Seaworld's conservation funds, or watch the TV show "Sea Rescue"

Go on facebook under the Seaworld fan page and find out why the members of that page are pro Seaworld. Likewise, go on the facebook pages of the organizations the previous poster listed to find out why they're all anti Seaworld. But again, you're going to get biased arguments either way.

So overall, listen and read views from either side of the argument. I would encourage you if you're going to see the movie Blackfish to also visit Seaworld and after watching the movie and visiting the park, make an informed decision based on what you've seen from both sides of the argument.
 
I think you're going to have a tough time finding an unbiased article one way or the other. Most animal rights people consider Seaworld to be hell on Earth while most Seaworld supporters consider Seaworld to be heaven on Earth.

What specifically good, bad and questionable are you looking to find out about Seaworld? Is it how the animals are cared for? Is it the living conditions of the animals? How the animals came to be at the park? Veterinary practices? The whales specifically?

Your best bet will probably be reading what people from both sides of the argument write on here. Because honestly, like a previous poster said, it's hard to form a true opinion unless you've researched the park like some of the posters on here have.

A previous poster listed a bunch of ideas of movies and text that you can read about the anti captivity point of view. Keep in mind that all the sources the poster listed are incredibly biased against Seaworld and are completely one sided to the argument.

Likewise, if you want completely one sided pro Seaworld links, I would check out any of Seaworld's conservation funds, or watch the TV show "Sea Rescue"

Go on facebook under the Seaworld fan page and find out why the members of that page are pro Seaworld. Likewise, go on the facebook pages of the organizations the previous poster listed to find out why they're all anti Seaworld. But again, you're going to get biased arguments either way.

So overall, listen and read views from either side of the argument. I would encourage you if you're going to see the movie Blackfish to also visit Seaworld and after watching the movie and visiting the park, make an informed decision based on what you've seen from both sides of the argument.

See, that's the thing, everything I read makes me think "well, of course you are going to say that"

And yes, the whales specifically. How they came to be at the park, how they are treated, the tanks they are in, all of it.

I have visited the park and I think its a beautiful park. The show with the whales made me cry because it was so beautiful and it made me think that there seemed to be such a bond with the trainers and the whales. I have been to other marine parks and the comparison is just amazing. Sea World is just miles and miles ahead of the others.

But, when I read other's opinions about it being so bad, I can't help but think "am I wrong".
 
I just some quick reading of a couple of facebook pages that are against Sea World. And here is my issue with reading this stuff, they come off as being over the top because of some of the language they use, not willing to have anyone ask a question or make a statement that isn't in line with THEIR thinking and going on about stupid stuff like a trainer balancing a cup on a whales nose or how horrible it is that a dolphin is trained to splash people. You have to really do some reading to find anything that might be a logical argument against Sea World but all the junk makes you wonder how much truth is in everything else they say.
 
I just some quick reading of a couple of facebook pages that are against Sea World. And here is my issue with reading this stuff, they come off as being over the top because of some of the language they use, not willing to have anyone ask a question or make a statement that isn't in line with THEIR thinking and going on about stupid stuff like a trainer balancing a cup on a whales nose or how horrible it is that a dolphin is trained to splash people. You have to really do some reading to find anything that might be a logical argument against Sea World but all the junk makes you wonder how much truth is in everything else they say.

Keep researching! I would suggest you stay away from Facebook pages. You'll get a lot of radical remarks that are pretty off putting. I know in your heart you want to find reasons to justify Sea World's captivity program. I really applaud you for taking it one step further and educating yourself so you can argue intelligently. No matter what decision you ultimately come to, you and I are not so different. We love these animals and want them healthy and happy.
 
Keep researching! I would suggest you stay away from Facebook pages. You'll get a lot of radical remarks that are pretty off putting. I know in your heart you want to find reasons to justify Sea World's captivity program. I really applaud you for taking it one step further and educating yourself so you can argue intelligently. No matter what decision you ultimately come to, you and I are not so different. We love these animals and want them healthy and happy.

Oh, I will! And you are right, I do love whales. I think they are some of the most beautiful animals on earth. And there are so many things about them that make them fascinating.

I remember a movie from years ago, I think back when Jaws came out maybe? The name of the movie was Orca and I guess it was supposed to be scary because of the whale coming after everyone. Anyway, at the beginning they took a whale's mate and maybe the calf. The sad sounds that whale made just made me cry and cry. It funny, I don't remember a lot of the rest of the movie.
 
Oh, I will! And you are right, I do love whales. I think they are some of the most beautiful animals on earth. And there are so many things about them that make them fascinating.

I remember a movie from years ago, I think back when Jaws came out maybe? The name of the movie was Orca and I guess it was supposed to be scary because of the whale coming after everyone. Anyway, at the beginning they took a whale's mate and maybe the calf. The sad sounds that whale made just made me cry and cry. It funny, I don't remember a lot of the rest of the movie.

Then you'll definitely cry during blackfish...
 
Oh, I will! And you are right, I do love whales. I think they are some of the most beautiful animals on earth. And there are so many things about them that make them fascinating.

I remember a movie from years ago, I think back when Jaws came out maybe? The name of the movie was Orca and I guess it was supposed to be scary because of the whale coming after everyone. Anyway, at the beginning they took a whale's mate and maybe the calf. The sad sounds that whale made just made me cry and cry. It funny, I don't remember a lot of the rest of the movie.

I remember it too! Richard Harris and Bo Derek were in that movie. The orca attacked them because Richard Harris' character killed his mate.
If you watch Blackfish or any film footage of orcas, dolphins, belugas, etc. being captured you will hear the same cries. It's heartbreaking.

The crazy thing about this whole thread and this discussion is I totally get why you want to see them, have access to them. They are so beautiful, fascinating, intelligent.
I have spent the past year planning to go to Taiji, Japan this winter to be a silent witness to the dolphin slaughter and capture with Sea Shepherd Cove Guardians. I have cancelled those plans however. After many discussions with friends, family and especially my husband I made the decision not to go. My heart can't watch it. I'm not strong enough. So I will stay in the states and continue to work from here.
Keep posting and let me know how your reading and research goes :)
 
See, that's the thing, everything I read makes me think "well, of course you are going to say that"

And yes, the whales specifically. How they came to be at the park, how they are treated, the tanks they are in, all of it.

I have visited the park and I think its a beautiful park. The show with the whales made me cry because it was so beautiful and it made me think that there seemed to be such a bond with the trainers and the whales. I have been to other marine parks and the comparison is just amazing. Sea World is just miles and miles ahead of the others.

But, when I read other's opinions about it being so bad, I can't help but think "am I wrong".

No you are not wrong. It is a beautiful park and I don't think it's a question of the people at seaworld being evil. For me it's more of knowing that scientist believe as the other poster pointed out, that orca's in captivity many times go insane, die out waaay earlier than in the wild and have higher rates of infant mortality that makes me believe that no matter how wonderful the captivity is, it still is a state that the animals don't do well in.

So for me it's more of a fact that yes, it's a pretty cage but it's still killing these animals. Now seaworld is equally correct, they cannot simply release their whales but it does need to truly evaluate whether it should keep proprating them simply for a show.

I equate them to the puppy mills in pa that simply force dogs to breed for profit KNOWING that it is detrimental for the animal.

I totally agree, I went one time many years ago and also thought the show was beautiful. But that is not enough for me to support it.

For me it's like the puppy mills in PA. It's the reason why I will never buy a dog from the pet store. They breed dogs for no other purpose than profit when they know it is detrimental to the animal.
 
I was very active on the other thread, didn't realize this was the same topic.

But see, people don't come into this argument with a reasoned set of views and demands without attracting, frankly, fanatical activists/apologists and perhaps somewhat naive people, on both sides, who refuse to compromise. I'm a realist not a seaworld apologist, I know that conditions are far from ideal at the seaworld parks, but I just can't see a way out, and I think that seaworld actually does some good for wildlife causes despite the more negative aspects of their operation.

You mention rehabilitation, but given the complicated hunting techniques used by wild orcas and their social relationships (much of which has been focused on in anti-captivity literature and media), could this be achieved? I'm doubtful. I've watched many an animal documentary in my time (from as neutral a source as I can get) and I've seen many examples of animals that cannot be released into the wild because of acclimatisation to human contact. Whilst I'm aware that orcas are perhaps more intelligent than some of these animals (though others like primates seem just as, if not more intelligent) I just can't see a method of rehabilitation that would allow captive orcas to reintegrate with the world. Undoing years of training and work with humans would take many years, if not decades, and most likely would be impossible in many cases it seems to me.

I could see no more breeding yes, there are enough whales there already anyway. But to achieve this what would you have happen? You would either need to seperate the whales up and keep them alone, sterilise them via operations (if even possible) or abort the calves. I can't see either of those options going down well.

Again, you mention sea pens, but where? How big would they have to be? Obviously bigger than seaworlds tanks, otherwise there would be little point, but the larger they are the more they would be vulnerable and expensive to maintain. Should we keep feeding them and maintaining human contact in these pens? That seems a little counter productive if we want to rehabilitate them. How would we teach them where to go, what time of year to find food, interact with other whales?

I'm sure answers to these questions are out there, but I've yet to find any that satisfy my doubts frankly. Seaworld isn't perfect, but I don't think they'll be going anywhere else soon, least of all the wild.

I'm sure this will seem brutal and uncaring to some, but frankly I can see causes both more urgent/deserving (in my opinion) and more likely to succeed out there that are neglected for whatever reason. It makes me a little sad to think that hardly anyone in the general public seems to care so much about the rare pet trade in endangered animals or products like ivory, or the dolphin slaughter mentioned earlier for example. And that's also a measure of Seaworlds impact I guess, the only reason killer whales are so prominent in culture today is down to seaworld and previous parks.

I'm not trying to disparage people who fight for what they see as a good cause however, we all have our beliefs.
 
For those on this thread that have brought up the topic of people who plan to boycott SW for holding killer whales in captivity, but still patronize AK and Epcot, I encourage you to find the Blackfish thread here (search Blackfishon the Dis boards) and read the back and forth on that topic (sorry I would post a link right now, but I am on an iPad with no easy way to do that).

Second, let's just for a second assume that it's ok to keep killer whales in captivity (I don't think so and have made long posts on the blackfish thread that I just mentioned above explaining my rationale) - SW also has a horrible record of protecting human trainers from the killer whales. I am sure that trainers are somewhat warned about the danger inherent in the job - ie you will be working with a large predator, but the movie blackfish was particularly damning about all the human incidents relating to killer whales in captivity at SW - culminating in the death of a very experienced trainer at SW in 2010. So even if I thought keeping killer whales in captivity was ok, I would still be very disgusted with SW's actions relating to their employees. I understand accidents can happen, but it is the volume and nature of the incidents at SW that are concerning to me.

As for someone that mentioned earlier on this thread that this topic isn't appropriate on a board where people on trying to make fun family travel plans, I strongly disagree. To me, it is important to educate yourself and as an educated consumer decide where to spend your money. For me, I have decided that I will no longer spend my money at SW. Everyone has to decide what is important and what isn't and spend their money accordingly. I personally think that you can't champion every cause and be 100% "perfect" in your beliefs and actions, but that's just me. I have read Animal Vegetable Miracle by Barbara Kingsolver, Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan, Fast Food Inc (can't remember the author's name off the top of my head) and watched Supersize Me and yet I still eat meat. Basically, all I can suggest is doing the research for yourself, talking/discussing with people who have similar and those that have different views from yourself and then deciding for yourself how to vote with your money. Perhaps someone would label me as a hypocrite for focusing more on some animal topics than other and perhaps I am, but in my mind better tone passionate about some issues then none at all.
 
But see, people don't come into this argument with a reasoned set of views and demands without attracting, frankly, fanatical activists/apologists and perhaps somewhat naive people, on both sides, who refuse to compromise. I'm a realist not a seaworld apologist, I know that conditions are far from ideal at the seaworld parks, but I just can't see a way out, and I think that seaworld actually does some good for wildlife causes despite the more negative aspects of their operation.

You mention rehabilitation, but given the complicated hunting techniques used by wild orcas and their social relationships (much of which has been focused on in anti-captivity literature and media), could this be achieved? I'm doubtful. I've watched many an animal documentary in my time (from as neutral a source as I can get) and I've seen many examples of animals that cannot be released into the wild because of acclimatisation to human contact. Whilst I'm aware that orcas are perhaps more intelligent than some of these animals (though others like primates seem just as, if not more intelligent) I just can't see a method of rehabilitation that would allow captive orcas to reintegrate with the world. Undoing years of training and work with humans would take many years, if not decades, and most likely would be impossible in many cases it seems to me.

I could see no more breeding yes, there are enough whales there already anyway. But to achieve this what would you have happen? You would either need to seperate the whales up and keep them alone, sterilise them via operations (if even possible) or abort the calves. I can't see either of those options going down well.

Again, you mention sea pens, but where? How big would they have to be? Obviously bigger than seaworlds tanks, otherwise there would be little point, but the larger they are the more they would be vulnerable and expensive to maintain. Should we keep feeding them and maintaining human contact in these pens? That seems a little counter productive if we want to rehabilitate them. How would we teach them where to go, what time of year to find food, interact with other whales?

I'm sure answers to these questions are out there, but I've yet to find any that satisfy my doubts frankly. Seaworld isn't perfect, but I don't think they'll be going anywhere else soon, least of all the wild.

I'm sure this will seem brutal and uncaring to some, but frankly I can see causes both more urgent/deserving (in my opinion) and more likely to succeed out there that are neglected for whatever reason. It makes me a little sad to think that hardly anyone in the general public seems to care so much about the rare pet trade in endangered animals or products like ivory, or the dolphin slaughter mentioned earlier for example. And that's also a measure of Seaworlds impact I guess, the only reason killer whales are so prominent in culture today is down to seaworld and previous parks.

I'm not trying to disparage people who fight for what they see as a good cause however, we all have our beliefs.

I should also mention I am also very much concerned with other topics that you mentioned such as the rare pet trade and poaching for ivory and rhino horns (and don't get me started on the practice of shark finning for shark fin soup, it's completely disgusting). An interesting book on the topic of wild birds in the pet trade is Of Parrots and People. I am conflicted on exactly what action to take on the issue of the ivory trade, rhino horns and shark fins. China is the number one importer of products made from endangered species. So, it seems like a good thing to do to vote with my money as a consumer is reduce consumption of products made in China? But on the flip side, the factory workers trying to make a living producing goods for export are not the ones buying ivory. It is the top "1%" in China that can afford such a thing so how do I stop sending my money to them without hurting the people in the factories? Is this an area where it would be better to lobby our government to impose trade sanctions or something to that degree? With SW, it is much more clear to me how to vote with my money - one company that I can choose not to buy a product from rather than a whole country.
 
See, that's the thing, everything I read makes me think "well, of course you are going to say that"

And yes, the whales specifically. How they came to be at the park, how they are treated, the tanks they are in, all of it.

I have visited the park and I think its a beautiful park. The show with the whales made me cry because it was so beautiful and it made me think that there seemed to be such a bond with the trainers and the whales. I have been to other marine parks and the comparison is just amazing. Sea World is just miles and miles ahead of the others.

But, when I read other's opinions about it being so bad, I can't help but think "am I wrong".

Five of Seaworld's 22 whales were captured from the wild, but not by Seaworld. The remaining 17 whales were born in captivity. I had a post on the first page that tells how those 5 wild captured whales came to be at Seaworld. You can easily find information online that backs what I have said. Simply do a google search for the whales name and then type Orca next to it. For example, search for "Tilly Orca" or any other whale you want to find more information about.

Though Seaworlds tanks are some of the best in the world as far as marine parks are concerned. However, i'll admit, I wish they were more realistic to the Ocean. For example, having rocks and Seaweed at the bottom.

Think about the whales that were born at Seaworld. Would releasing them into the Ocean, a place they have never been before, cause more harm than good? Research about Keiko the whale from the movie free willy. He was released back into the wild. Just do a google search for him and find out the result of his release and both the pros and cons on the release.
 
I really recommend that people read "Killer Controversy: why orcas should mo longer be kept in captivity."
http://www.hsi.org/assets/pdfs/orca_white_paper.pdf

Ending the public display of orcas
There are currently 42 orcas in captivity world-wide, held in 12 facilities in seven countries. Captive breeding occurs in only some of these facilities, most notably the SeaWorld parks in the United States, Kamogawa Sea World in Japan, and Marineland Antibes in France. The vast majority of births occur at SeaWorld parks. These circumstances support the contention that ending the public display of orcas is manageable and would have only minor economic impacts, primarily affecting only a small number of public display facilities.
Captive breeding of this species should end, as it serves no conservation purpose105. Live trade in orcas should also end106. The population of captive orcas can be eliminated through attrition, with the animals currently alive evaluated for continued display, retirement to sea pens, or rehabilitation and possible release to the wild if appropriate. The 12 affected oceanaria would thus have a number of years (possibly 30 or more in some cases)110 to transition their exhibits from orca performances to another medium. To protect trainers during the transition period, all in-water work with these animals should end.
We emphasize that we are not proposing blanket closure of oceanaria. We are proposing a phasing out of orca exhibition, taking as long as three decades, giving oceanaria sufficient time to repurpose their orca enclosures. We believe this is eminently reasonable and will minimize the financial impacts of ending this practice.
 














Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE







New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top