I think most people were just answering the question, not doing into detail how they came to the conclusion. But being that the topic has opened up
I for one did not just read the board members bios
they say nothing or very little on their actions on the board during their tenure. I did many hours of research on the web
went back many years and read the annual reports which I have, but are also available online.
Im own a large number of shares, which is why I think I not only received letters from Roy Disney and Stanley Gold, but also from the Walt Disney Company itself signed by the board members, (not sure maybe they sent letters to all share holders) each stating their position on the company
.which prompted me to dig deeper.
There are many articles on Disney management, deals, board members actions, etc. on the internet, and from many investment websites. I went all the way back to pre-Eisner days. If you read and analyze the articles by numerous authors, to include Disney board members, stock trends, and the annual reports...you will see a very interesting trend. It was very obvious that the Eisner/Wells team did well
very well
but then notice what happened after Wells passed. Then look at the annual reports
many of which started with the theme that its been a very difficult year for Disney, and then goes on to explain why. In the reports Eisner talks about the expansion and in the coming years all we have to do is reap the benefits. Well, this went on for several years, then 9/11
which was no doubt a blow to Disney and many other travel related business
among others. Then look at the actions of the board members, with all deals that did not go well, and the raises the board approved for Eisner and crew, during one of the Disney Companys most difficult time. Look at the successes during that time, and how they were handled. Look at the production successes during Wells tenure, and then after Wells tenure
and the Pixar successes compared with Disney Productions
and we all know what happened to Pixar (all though when you read various articles
both companies drove a hard deals). There are tons of articles and stories, and statistical trends about Disney management and deals, from the parks to ABC to ESPN to the
Disney Store to every entity that Disney owns. My own conclusions, Roy Disneys argument had more merit than Eisners argument (both augments have flaws, which you will notice if you do your homework
but one does have more merit than the other). Some of you may disagree
but thats OK.
So, as Chuck alludes, you need to do the research before you vote
however much more than just read Bios and what is being voted
look at the trends
do you own analysis
weigh the risks verses the benefits
and come to your own conclusions
..and most important be ready to accept the consequences or benefits one way or another of your vote.