A lot of time is wasted at WDW because everything is so far apart. From the time spent traveling from the hotels to the parks to the time within the parks themselves. Until you've been to both DLR and WDW I think it's hard to appreciate this.
A lot of time is wasted at WDW because everything is so far apart. From the time spent traveling from the hotels to the parks to the time within the parks themselves. Until you've been to both DLR and WDW I think it's hard to appreciate this.
But one thing...many people go to Disney World in what, 10 days or so and still find it's not enough time.
But you always hear of people saying you can go through Disneyland in 2-3 days. To me, that would seem like you would get bored as not as much. I've only been to Disney World so can only comment on that where we did 3 parks in 5 days...but we definitely could have done a few more days (even with still skipping AK)
A few things to say here. The first is that you would be hard pressed to fit everything into 2-3 days at the DLR, especially if you include hotel and DTD activities. When people say they do DL in 2-3 days they either were on turbo mode or they skipped lots of things. And that is ok, but it does confuse some people. I don't know how someone could see all the entertainment options in both parks in 2 nights, it would be very difficult. Not to mention would severely hamper your ability to ride any attractions during the evening. I think 3 nights is minimum and you won't really see everything, but you can get a lot done.
Secondly, it is my understanding that it takes a lot of time to travel between parks and resorts at WDW. I read reports where it can take 30-45 minutes to go from a resort to a park. This problem does not exist at the DLR. Everything is within walking distance and will take 10 or so minutes. So subtract travel time from your DLR itinerary.
Thirdly, there are way fewer resorts and restaurants at DLR. There are no waterparks and our DTD has fewer entertainment and eating options. So while the DLR is pretty favorable in the attractions department, it does not have nearly the same number of other forms of entertainment that allow people to spend 10 days at a crack.
Hope this helps explain things. I recommend three days at the bare minimum to all my friends. They can't always swing it, but once I start laying out all the entertainment and such, they start to get the picture. There is a lot to do.
A few things to say here. The first is that you would be hard pressed to fit everything into 2-3 days at the DLR, especially if you include hotel and DTD activities. When people say they do DL in 2-3 days they either were on turbo mode or they skipped lots of things. And that is ok, but it does confuse some people. I don't know how someone could see all the entertainment options in both parks in 2 nights, it would be very difficult. Not to mention would severely hamper your ability to ride any attractions during the evening. I think 3 nights is minimum and you won't really see everything, but you can get a lot done.
Secondly, it is my understanding that it takes a lot of time to travel between parks and resorts at WDW. I read reports where it can take 30-45 minutes to go from a resort to a park. This problem does not exist at the DLR. Everything is within walking distance and will take 10 or so minutes. So subtract travel time from your DLR itinerary.
Thirdly, there are way fewer resorts and restaurants at DLR. There are no waterparks and our DTD has fewer entertainment and eating options. So while the DLR is pretty favorable in the attractions department, it does not have nearly the same number of other forms of entertainment that allow people to spend 10 days at a crack.
Hope this helps explain things. I recommend three days at the bare minimum to all my friends. They can't always swing it, but once I start laying out all the entertainment and such, they start to get the picture. There is a lot to do.
I agree with all of this. (And we have done both WDW and DLR many times each.)
I scratch my head when someone says DLR only takes 2-3 days to experience. Even after our 5 day trip I had a few things I wanted to do and never got to. But we are very park centric, and never do water parks at WDW.
Thanks for explaining. I'm just going by what people have said as you only need "a few days" which really differs from Disney World. But we only did 5 days at DW (with a day of a break inbetween), but if we were to go to Disneyland someday, then I could see us doing about the same. If we're going all that way (we're in Ontario Canada), then I would want to spend more then a couple days.
And yes...travel between parks at Disney World is far...even when staying onsite. We had a car, but just the time to park and get to the park does take time. Some people return to the hotel mid day, but for us, once we were at a park, we stayed there. And we didn't bother with park hopping for the same reason.
As for waterparks, we didn't bother with those at Disney World. The main parks were just so much more appealing. (Having said that, we travelled in Oct as opposed to Aug)
I hope that helps! It really is like a mini, super dense WDW. I think if you are coming from Canada, 2 days would not be nearly worth it. There is quite a lot to see, I have spent entire days just seeing the entertainment options and enjoying the restaurants. Plus there is lots to do in Southern California as well.
Transportation is really one of those things that scares me about WDW. Because DL is so easy to navigate, WDW seems so big and foreign. But one of these days...![]()