MickeyMouseGal
<font color=deeppink>Have A Zip A Dee Doo Dah Zip
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2005
- Messages
- 2,609
Very good insight! Thank you for sharingSo sorry to hijack the thread, but I have a question for you MickeyMouseGal... our vet determined that because our cat had indeed been FVAC-positive, the risk of vaccinating her in the future is too risky based on studies that were done and the very strong chance of recurrence....
Now, in Molly's case, she had the reactive-lump shortly after being vaccinated @ 4 months old. Our vet chose to do the same with her as with Anastasia because she did have a rare side-effect. I know being an indoor cat is not fool-proof for rabies (like you mentioned, bats...), but for our vet, she will continue to offer them care w/o the vaccine so long as they are indoor cats.
Ok-so now the question, has your practice ever re-vaccinated a pet that had the benign reaction only to have them actually end up with FVAC after a subsequent vaccination? I'm just curious since Molly is barely a year old and I do hate not having her vaccinated any more at such a young age where Anastasia was 8 when she developed the cancer..... BUT I can't risk raising Molly's chances of getting FVAC....
Thanks so much in advance! TAKitty.... thinking of you and your cat!!! Hoping it's just a benign reaction!!!!![]()
I have only seen a handfull of fibrosarcoma cats, and I can't remember if any of them had previously had local rabies reactions. Sorry. But considering your history, I would recommend having a titer drawn for that cat next year. If she does not have a protective titer, I would recommend she be given the vaccine in her lower leg. From my own personal experience, one of my cats had the local reaction as a kitten (it seems to be more common with their first rabies vaccine) and has had subsequent rabies vaccines without any problems. She has even been given the three year vaccine, but I always put it in her leg.