°O°Joe
A perfect disquise! Ha ha ha!
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2005
- Messages
- 2,627
dizprincess717, I really do feel this is a stupid arguement, because she wasn't hurt. But it was a near miss and I'm sorry, I still dissagree. What about Kali River Rapids? It has restraints... Those ride vehicles could in theory sink, right?
You might think differently someday when you are a parent, but me personally - I just want to have fun and see my kids have fun, and you want your kids to feel like if there's anywhere they can feel 100% safe, it's at the Happiest place on Earth. You wouldn't think that you would have to constantly worry about your children's safety on the ride. I've never felt that way before and I don't feel I should have to. And trust me, after that happened, there's no way my daughter will ride that ride again for years, because she won't feel safe. Which sucks, because it is still my favorite ride and I enjoy it tremendously.
And I do feel if she were somehow injured from her fall, I could have won in a lawsuit. I'm not the type of person that would sue, because I don't believe in that, but I don't think Disney would stand a chance in that lawsuit.
I would like to believe these rides are designed to ensure peoples safety while riding, whether 4 years old or 90. I would feel safe sending a whole train load of 4 or 5 year olds on BTMR. I can't say the same about Splash. IMO they're targeted to the same audience.
I understand when you say you were on my side and that you are sorry this happened. But you say it is the parents responsiblity and you have to watch your own kids. Well, I do watch my kids and I consider myself a darn good parent, and I guess when you are criticized like that and made out to look like your irresponsible, it hurts your pride a little bit. Someday you'll understand that.
I never said you, a CM, or Disney were at fault for my daughter falling. But I still think more good would come out of safety restraints than bad. So what if the ride is slowed down by having to make certain everyone is properly secured. BTMR would be much faster if people could just jump on and send them on their way, maybe they need to lose the restraints on BTMR.
You might think differently someday when you are a parent, but me personally - I just want to have fun and see my kids have fun, and you want your kids to feel like if there's anywhere they can feel 100% safe, it's at the Happiest place on Earth. You wouldn't think that you would have to constantly worry about your children's safety on the ride. I've never felt that way before and I don't feel I should have to. And trust me, after that happened, there's no way my daughter will ride that ride again for years, because she won't feel safe. Which sucks, because it is still my favorite ride and I enjoy it tremendously.
And I do feel if she were somehow injured from her fall, I could have won in a lawsuit. I'm not the type of person that would sue, because I don't believe in that, but I don't think Disney would stand a chance in that lawsuit.
I would like to believe these rides are designed to ensure peoples safety while riding, whether 4 years old or 90. I would feel safe sending a whole train load of 4 or 5 year olds on BTMR. I can't say the same about Splash. IMO they're targeted to the same audience.
I understand when you say you were on my side and that you are sorry this happened. But you say it is the parents responsiblity and you have to watch your own kids. Well, I do watch my kids and I consider myself a darn good parent, and I guess when you are criticized like that and made out to look like your irresponsible, it hurts your pride a little bit. Someday you'll understand that.
I never said you, a CM, or Disney were at fault for my daughter falling. But I still think more good would come out of safety restraints than bad. So what if the ride is slowed down by having to make certain everyone is properly secured. BTMR would be much faster if people could just jump on and send them on their way, maybe they need to lose the restraints on BTMR.



