(Should I list my 8 year old as being 10 so) that he can get the adult dining plan? I realize that his park tickets would be a little more.
We're planning on going during the
free dining and my 8 year old is just not going to eat a lot of things on the kids menu. My kids are used to eating more adult fare. I realize that he may not eat entire adult size meals but I like the idea of him having more choices of what I would consider real food even if he only eats half of what he's given.
The original poster asked this question, "Should I?" If she had absolutely no concern that it might not be allowed or might not be ethical, she wouldn't have asked it.
I'm not gonna flame anybody. But it really is a personal ethics question, and opens up a lot of gray areas. Should I tell Disney my 3 year old is only 2 so I don't have to pay for a park ticket or the dining plan on our package? Should I tell my small 10 year old to say he is 9 so we can pay the kid's price? Should I list my 6 year old as an adult, share our meals with her, then have extra TS credits to have some signature meals? Should I list my 4 year old on my sister's room reservation so I don't have to buy the dining plan for her since she hardly eats anything anyway?
The dining plan is being offered free for a certain time period, and Disney obviously didn't plan on families getting the adult plan for every child in their party -- otherwise, they would just give the adult plan to everyone, regardless of age. However, if a CM is suggesting or allowing you to change your child's age in the computer in order to get the adult plan for free, then it really muddies the waters. You can certainly opt to do that if you are paying OOP for the plan, but then you are not only paying the $30 difference for the week's ticket, you would also be paying $28
per day extra for the adult DDP. This is where it starts to get shaky. And some CM's last year were encouraging people to pay OOP for their kids' TS meals and bank those credits for additional meals later, since there was no differentiation between adult and child credits. This was blatantly against the rules, and so costly for Disney that they actually changed their entire computer system to stop it from happening. Now pretty much the same thing is happening with CS credits. It is possible to do, and evidently a lot of CM's are allowing it to happen, but it's clearly against the rules for the plan.
So...right now, "aging" your child to get the adult plan for them for free is possible to do. Sounds like some of the CM's are allowing or even suggesting it. So, Disney will probably:
~change the system to make it impossible (as with the TS credits),
~start policing and punishing CM's who allow it or suggest it (as they are starting to do with CS credits),
~stop offering free dining if it is costing the company too much money,
~or keep looking the other way, not "allowing" it, but doing nothing to stop it.