I totally agree that
DVC can and SHOULD charge "self extenders", but I'm a little confused about why some of you think blocking the keys at 11 is a "bad" thing. If you are supposed to be out by 11, why should your key work after that?
To quote from my post a couple pages ago:
According to Florida Statute 509.141 a public lodging establishment has the right to evict a guest who fails to check-out by the agreed-upon time, but only after providing notice as follows:
The operator of any public lodging establishment or public food service establishment shall notify such guest that the establishment no longer desires to entertain the guest and shall request that such guest immediately depart from the establishment. Such notice may be given orally or in writing. If the notice is in writing, it shall be as follows:
"You are hereby notified that this establishment no longer desires to entertain you as its guest, and you are requested to leave at once. To remain after receipt of this notice is a misdemeanor under the laws of this state."
At the very least, Disney has no authority to formally evict a guest (locking them out of their room would qualify) without going thru the process above. This isn't just legal red tape...it's the Florida statute and it's designed specifically to protect the rights of the hotel guest just as much as the operator.
Whether the same applies to DVC members (timeshare owners) has not been established. But it would certainly keep resorts from establishing across-the-board policies, even at resorts like OKW and SSR since they play host to cash guests as well.
That's pretty much the end of the discussion...unless someone can prove that timeshare resort operators have different rights with regard to handling of guests.
Even
IF DVC members could legally be locked out of their rooms, I can't see Disney doing it. You'd have a daily stream of people to the front desk who needed their keys re-activated for whatever reason. That creates additional work for the CMs, hassle (albeit justified) for the outgoing guest, and additional wait time for the incoming guests who are stuck in a line longer waiting for others' key cards to be re-activated. Given our society, it would probably generate more than a few lawsuits, too ("Disney kept me from getting to my medication", "my cell phone was locked in the room and I missed an important business call", "my baby's formula was in the room", etc.)
When you figure the 30,000 resort rooms at WDW, many of which are turned-over 2-3 times per week, the number of complaints that can be traced to late departures appears infinitesimal, IMO. Just look back at the original post here, for example. The resort KNEW that the room assigned to OP had guests who were staying another night and they ultimately DID find OP a vacant room. It was only their lack of responsiveness that kept OP from getting into that room until well after the posted check-in time.
I agree with every adjective that one would apply to people who willfully violate the rules (discourteous, rude, self-centered, entitled, etc.) But given the fact that a housekeeping CM handles a dozen or more rooms on any day, I doubt that the number of late departures often has a bearing on guests' ability to access rooms.