D
darrose
Guest
My opinion is that the Steelers won



I appreciate your opinion and I am sure I would be saying the same thing had the situation been reversed. However, there is no way to know that the outcome would have been in the Hawks favor had anything been any different. i would agree that they would have done better, but won? I don't think so.Had they not have to play against the Steelers 12th man - in this case the refs - they probably would have won.
I think that is just paranoid. I do not think this was a huge conspiracy.All of the hype, the commercials only showing 3 Seattle players with the trophy versus how many Steeler players just confirms that Seattle was destined to lose no matter how good of a game they played.
poohandwendy said:I don't think so. I think that is just paranoid. I do not think this was a huge conspiracy.
No problem. I have no personal issue with you and I have meant no disrespect. I can understand your feelings, even if I disagree with them I cannot say I would not feel the same way if the situation were reversed.BriarfoxinWA said:PoohandWendy - I'm just tired of defending my position to you on every thread I post on. Let's just agree to disagree and leave it at that.
I can totally agree with that, we have been on the underdog side many, many times. (I was saying the entire week before that I hated how the media fixated on one team (this time it was the Steelers) and played favorites. I think it is unprofessional. They are both great teams and deserved to be respected equally)While it is paranoid to think conspiracy--it is clear bias of a network airing a championship game. (And we had other problems with the coverage as well in general).

Dixie Luvr 98 said:During The KDKA coverage of the Steeler parade in Pittsburgh today, a reprter asked Ben about the statement. Ben said that he had since seen the tape of the play and that it was in. What he said on Leterman was seemingly just his thoughts at the time of the play.
poohandwendy said:I was really just adressing the idea of whether or not things like that were some sort of proof that the Seahawks had no chance at winning, or that the game was fixed.

poohandwendy said:For what it is worth, if you feel the refs cheated the Seahawks in this game then you can probably understand that the Steelers are also cheated by the controversy.
I really do not see how that will really change in the future because human beings are in charge of officiating and no one will ever feel that it is totally fair. Especially in the big games.
True, but you will always have people thinking the calls are unreasonable. If anything, I think the main complaint I would have as a Seahawks fan is that they took the rules too literally. I think most of the calls were legit, but should they have been called? Were they being too picky? That would be my complaint.Lisa loves Pooh said:At least with play reviews..they were able to show--that despite it being just a hair across the plane--that the call was good.
I like that there is opportunity to review plays--it at least cancels out a little bit of the human error.
Lisa loves Pooh said:My husband had the same observation about all the trophy shots.
While it is paranoid to think conspiracy--it is clear bias of a network airing a championship game. (And we had other problems with the coverage as well in general).
Claiming some great consipiracy is ridiculous. The media went after the story and there weren't many beyond Bettis and Porter leading up to the game.You are absolutely right.Dixie Luvr 98 said:During The KDKA coverage of the Steeler parade in Pittsburgh today, a reprter asked Ben about the statement. Ben said that he had since seen the tape of the play and that it was in. What he said on Leterman was seemingly just his thoughts at the time of the play.
HayGan said:As for the trophy picture question, I don't see where there was that huge of a discrepancy. The Steelers shown holding the ball were Roethlisberger, Ward, Bettis, Porter, Polamalu and Cowher. The Seahwaks shown were Hasselbeck, Alexander, Stevens and Holmgren (that I can remember.) The Steelers shown were all people that most football watching Americans would recognize. Same for the Seahawks. I can't think of many other Seahawks that most American football fans would be able to recognizeClaiming some great consipiracy is ridiculous. The media went after the story and there weren't many beyond Bettis and Porter leading up to the game.
BriarfoxinWA said:I wish I had access to those commercials - it became a joke at my house - let's count the Seahawks! There were only 2 of the trophy commercials that we even caught sight of anyone from the Seattle team. I don't recognize many of the Steeler's players so we were just watching the jerseys. I didn't really notice the first time or two it ran but once one of DH's friends pointed it out - we really started looking for it.