Got it.
First off I read too quickly. But now I've typed up this whole damn thing so I'm going to post it anyway.
Yes you can see a gain on your investment,
but it's a poor one. The red flags just went off when I saw your post because I ran these numbers a ton and any way you realistically slice it it isn't a good moneymaker.
I do think your assumptions are too generous in favor of
DVC.
Concerns/Assumptions:
- Is $10/point premium attainable, every year?
- I'm going to assume it is. Side note - I inflated both the annual dues and the premium by 3% each year which helps your cause but I thought it was more realistic. Year one you have $2,000 to invest, Year two $2,060 and so on.
- Closing Costs
- I don't think they're fair to ignore but I've done so for the sake of this equation
- Interest rate
- This is the big one. 5% over 50 years is super, super bad, assuming we're dumping this into a total market index fund. Yes, future results could be worse than historic averages but if that's the case over 50 years then maybe people aren't spending a ton to rent DVC points either.
- I used 7%. Still historically a little low, but again, trying to be conservative but realistic here.
- Taxes
- This is the BIG one I'm not really going to touch. Renting DVC points counts as income. I'm guessing most people dropping 30-35k on points are in at least the 22% marginal bracket, even assuming no state taxes. Yes, investments are taxed, too, but generally at a lower rate and also easier to shield, like if any of this can be put into a retirement account to grow
If you lump $32k into the stock market and see a 7% annual return you'll have $880k in 49 years. If instead you buy these DVC points and rent them out at your premium each year you'll end up with $743k, a difference of $137k. If you include $1,000 worth of closing costs you're up to $177k difference.
When I think of investing I always assume the opportunity cost is a pure index fund investment, because that's what nearly everyone's investments should be with a 50 year time horizon. So again, I read too quickly and was wrong. It does have a NPV, it just isn't a very good one given the risk involved. You'd be much better off investing or, if you were OK with the lower return, then doing it in a much more stable and liquid vehicle.