This is what we are thinking too. I mean really, we use our shower every day....the whirlpool tub...the kids use it a few times a year. It's a waste of space.
I would totally buy a house with a luxury shower over a dinky shower and a waste of space whirl pool tub.
I would totally buy a house with a luxury shower over a dinky shower and a waste of space whirl pool tub.
I've been thinking about doing the same thing -- we have a smaller (not horribly tiny, but a little cramped) shower, and a decent-sized whirlpool tub, but in 11 years, I can count on both hands the number of times it's been used (except for washing the dog, which we can do somewhere else). My problem is that even though the bathroom is huge, there's no linen closet -- I'd like to tear out the shower, make that the linen closet, and turn the tub area into a luxury shower. I've worried about the resale too! Maybe I'll ask my realtor boss. I'll let you know what she says.
All of my homes were built in the 70s or 80s. I worked in homebuilding in the mid-80s and then soaking tubs were optional upgrades. Before and after my homebuilding stint I worked in apartment development/management. I've never in all of my years of real estate experience heard of the term 'true master.' If it was attached to the master, had a tub or shower, it was a master bath.
I thought the same thing until we stayed in a house with this type of shower stall and absolutely loved it. We have since been looking at examples online and most are so nice; not what I remember from the '70's. We won't do the glass block if we keep the tub and do the same size small shower stall that we currently have because I don't think it will look good at all. If we get rid of the tub, we are pretty confident that the glass block will enhance the look.

