The UK study that got the US clamping down can be read by everyone now.
Optimism is lovely but it isn't necessarily realistic.
This guy sums it up well for people who don't want to read the whole thing.
The predictions in the report likely contain significant errors:
https://necsi.edu/review-of-ferguson-et-al-impact-of-non-pharmaceutical-interventions
In addition to the methodology errors, even a slight change in the assumed variables creates drastic swings in the predicted outcomes (will post link later today, when not on my phone). Since the variables are based on assumptions, the reports value depends in the accuracy of those assumptions, which are questionable at this point. Furthermore, if the report is accurate, humanity in a ridiculous amount of trouble, since we will be forced to choose between millions of deaths or bringing commerce to its knees for a year or more, which could lead to the suffering of billions of people and significant death in itself (the world generally has about 30 days of food supply on hand at any time). I don't know what we are even supposed to do with that kind of information, which gives us even more reason to make sure there is sound scientific reason for its predictions, and thank goodness, there is reason to have significant doubts.
Also, looking at the data coming out of Washington, there is reason to believe that acquiring significantly more testing has not shown significantly more cases as people had predicted. Furthermore, despite being significantly behind isolation policies, their hospitals were not overwhelmed as predicted. Yes, we could still easily see that in the U.S., and I support and practice social distancing, but I remain optimistic that this will develop differently in many regions than it has in places like Italy.
In addition, there are new test manufacturers coming online (one in Utah yesterday says it can now produce 50,000 test per day) and even promising cures under research in multiple countries.
Add to that the fact that we still don't know how seasonal changes will effect the virus.
And some countries are now seeing cured patients outpacing new infections.
I work in a job where I am reviewing the data daily and basically living in the virus news all day, every day. I am not burying my head in the sand.
I remain optimistic, but cautious. Let's assess mid-April and the next several months and see which of us was more accurate. Only time will tell. I could easily be wrong, but outside following the medical guidance, it is outside of our control and assuming the worst will happen will only contribute to additional anxiety and stress (ironically making us more vulnerable to the virus).