I don't like any of the pics.. maybe because the outfits are just... horrible? =/ But in all but one I thought the bigger girl looked better, prolly because the skinny one had a bad face (skeletal). And the hairdos were quite unfortunate.
I'm a very critical person. xD
But IMO for someone who's 5'9 to be a US size 0 is icky. If you're 5'9 you should be a size 3 at least >.>
A 16 is so not plus sized!
I really hate it when magazines and shops say that. >.<
Their plus-sized ranges start at like a 14 (US 10) which is stupid since the avergae UK woman is a 16.
I think the plus sized model looks much better in all of the pictures.
She really doesn't look to be what I would consider "plus sized."
I don't really like any of the pictures though, because those outfits are horrible and it's clearly photo shopped.
Isn't the average woman in the US a size 14? So if clothing designers want to sell products, you would think they would put better representations of women on their runways.
Doesn't plus size in clothing start at 16 or 18? ...that's why it frustrates me when I see 'plus-size' models that are a size 10 or 12.