You have to admit that both the Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield versions of Spider-Man are both far better than Tom Holland. Marvel really dropped the ball and the character would do better with Sony. Correct?
Is this a serious question or satire? Holland is fantastic, Macguire was good, but Garfield was terrible.
Garfield was good. That was a good movie. The 2nd one was horrible.
You have to admit that both the Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield versions of Spider-Man are both far better than Tom Holland. Marvel really dropped the ball and the character would do better with Sony. Correct?
I’ll give you that, he wasn’t bad in TASM but the second movie was awful and left a bad taste of Garfield in my mouth. Kinda like SM3 and Macguire, the only difference is he had the awesome SM2 that made the blow of the third movie a little softer.
While we're doing controversial Spiderman opinions....
I thought Into the Spiderverse was just an ok movie
Why do they have to admit that? I completely disagree and like Tom Holland best.You have to admit that both the Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield versions of Spider-Man are both far better than Tom Holland. Marvel really dropped the ball and the character would do better with Sony. Correct?
Why do they have to admit that? I completely disagree and like Tom Holland best.
I really liked Tobey Maguire as Spiderman, never saw Andrew Garfield's movie, and LOVED the Tom Holland Spideman movies. I liked Homecoming better, but saw both a few times, and will watch them again. The original (TM) I saw twice.