I was just providing the same comparison column (with better math) as the OPI don't understand your last column. Shouldn't it say that tickets today are 300% more than in 1971, adjusted for inflation?
'Free' dining, and the dining plans in general, have destroyed the dining experience at WDW.That tells quite a story.
I would like to see a similar chart for buffet prices to see how they stack up. Free Dining did a number on those offerings.
Yes, you are right. ALL the dining plans contributed to the staggeringly rapid increase in food prices - specifically the buffets and character meals.'Free' dining, and the dining plans in general, have destroyed the dining experience at WDW.
Yes, you are right. ALL the dining plans contributed to the staggeringly rapid increase in food prices - specifically the buffets and character meals.
Nor could I. The reason is because we have to remember that Disney is a luxury item. It is not needed for our continued survival, we won't keel over dead because we cannot afford to go there. It is strictly an entertainment venue. The numbers that they charge are not included in the calculation of cost of living and are not in anyway erroneous in not being concerned if they continue to raise prices above that figure. It is meaningless to think that it even should be connected. It's like saying that you cannot afford a Mercedes so they should all be priced the same as a Ford Focus. If you cannot afford it, you just don't buy it, you find a cheaper means of transportation. The exact principle applies in this case.I couldn't choose any of those choices.
Umm...OP as others have pointed out, your math doesn't seem to line up. I have a chart somewhere on my computer (downloaded from another site) showing the price of a one-day ticket to MK from 1971 to present with another line showing inflation. The two had quite a gap between them.
Look, I may not love Disney raising their prices but I accept that they're a business and they can do that, but you can't use inflation as an excuse. It's generally accepted that Disney ticket prices have way outpaced inflation. Sorry OP.
When you lay it out like this, it seems logical. If you want to take it one step further, you could itemize price per ride based on the average number of ride options in 1971 vs. now. Price per ride would be lower, right? Note that while I'd love a lower price, Disney is certainly keeping up with the times. Universal is keeping up as well, they're charging $105 for one park/one day and $155 park hopping.
With the influx of threads discussing ticket price changes, I thought I'd have some fun and look at ticket price changes since WDW opened in 1971. I've charted one-day adult tickets over time to see how annual rate hikes grew. Then, I made annual inflation adjustments to match the change in consumer price index year over year.
As it turns out, Disney isn't just pulling prices out of themselves! Ticket prices correlate very strongly with inflation, and although there may be a disparity for a few years at a time where prices may grow notably faster or slower than CPI changes, over the long run there is virtually no difference between the actual price at the gate versus the inflation-adjusted 1971 ticket.
The current 2016 ticket price of $105 for a one-day MK ticket is only 0.09% higher than the $104.91 that a 1971 ticket would cost today (it cost $5.75 in 1971).
What does the DIS think about putting price hikes in context? The cost on the price sheet is increasing, sure, but it's keeping in line with the increase of everything else we consume and, presumably, annual salaries.
Note: In 1970s, 12 ride tickets were used.
In 1980-1990s, one-day tickets were used
In 2000s-2010s, one-day MYW base ticket for MK was used
Small chart:
![]()
Big chart with prices overlaid:
![]()
Chart of prices, inflation, and disparity
![]()