I think you are missing the point. The picture shows 1/2 a cap. Cap B is 25% larger, so most consumers will use 25% more based on the picture. There are 6 different lines inside each cap labeled A, B, C, D, 1, 2. They are difficult to read and are the same color as the cap. I doubt anyone is that dilligent. Most people go by the picture on the container which shows using a 1/2 a cap. I am sure they aren't violating any laws but it is very deceptive.
Umm, well I guess you are a better laundress than me.That's why it isn't a good idea to use the cap to measure. All the brands do this - in the box of powdered Tide in my basement, the "fill" line on the scoop is about 1/3 of the way up. Why? Because they know most people won't look at the line and will use more. A lot of people don't even look at the back of the package or the lines and just use a full scoop. If they sized the scoop/cup to what is actually needed they'd sell less soap.
The first thing I do with store-bought soap is to put an appropriately sized measuring cup in/near the package. Otherwise I have my DH and kids using much more than is needed because of the way the packaging is designed. It has gotten to the point where I prefer making my own just so I'm not watching out for (and getting aggravated with) all these little tricks companies come up with to give less value for your dollar.
I wasn't asking for opinions on detergent. The smell of Tide nauseates me and my Purex does just fine for 1/3 the price.After trying every kind of detergent out there, I won't use anything but Tide. It costs a bit more, unless it is on sale, but I don't have to use as much, so it lasts longer.
So OP, did you actually check and see if the second bottle cap uses more detergent, according to the lines?
Use water to check, like msmayor suggested. Remember that old science experiment of which cup holds more water? The tall one or the wide one?
Before contacting Purex, make sure what you're claiming is true, and using water is the fastest and easiest way to check. It will literally take 15 seconds.
OP NEVER said it was according to the lines. She said it was the instructions on the back of both bottles showed to use 1/2 cap. Then she very specifically gave the quantities that each cap held. This is all in her first post. Could have been read in 15 seconds......
Actually the instructions DON'T say to use 1/2 cap. They say to fill it to the line, and show an APPROXIMATE location of that line.OP NEVER said it was according to the lines. She said it was the instructions on the back of both bottles showed to use 1/2 cap. Then she very specifically gave the quantities that each cap held. This is all in her first post. Could have been read in 15 seconds......
OP NEVER said it was according to the lines. She said it was the instructions on the back of both bottles showed to use 1/2 cap. Then she very specifically gave the quantities that each cap held. This is all in her first post. Could have been read in 15 seconds......
Actually the instructions DON'T say to use 1/2 cap. They say to fill it to the line, and show an APPROXIMATE location of that line.
In fact, according to the OP, each load should take 46mL. Then she(?) points out the 'old' cap used 50mL (if you went by exactly half). So I guess the company was being 'deceptive' then too?
If I had the two purex bottles in question, I'd do the test. I don't use purex, so I can't. The OP does.
Those of who say the OP didn't go far enough aren't saying she's wrong. But she is making some assumptions that may not stand up to testing. That testing would take a small amount of time and make her claim MUCH stronger.
But the company isn't engaging in 'deceptive advertising' (which is what the OP is claiming). Is the company responsible for making sure consumers follow the instructions (which I'm guessing say 'fill to the line in the cap') and not assume? How should a company do that?The whole idea is that many people would just look at the bottle and 'assume' half a capful and pour in more detergent then the instructions actually say. No harm just sudsier clothes and a lighter pocketbook and more company profits.
I know I'm taking this to the extreme, but using your example, should the light bulb manufacturer state on their package: 'Turn off after use'. After all, the more you use the product (in this case light bulbs), the quicker you run out.And, when you have a houseful of people doing their own laundry, the $18 bottle can disappear fast. The same way that 9 lights on in the house after everyone has gone to bed adds to your power bill, or a dripping faucet.
Little things add up. We often do things automatically. That's the point.
Honestly, I've never looked at a drawing on a package as the final say when measuring. I might look at the drawing to see where the line is or a chart that says 'use line A for a light load, 1 for a normal load, and 2 for a heavy load'. But I'm going to look in the cap for the location of those lines. Because I know a skinnier cap will have the line higher while a wider cap will have the line lower.Maybe Purex thought everybody who has used their product for many years would immediately read the instructions if the packaging changed slightly.
I doubt it.
But the company isn't engaging in 'deceptive advertising' (which is what the OP is claiming). Is the company responsible for making sure consumers follow the instructions (which I'm guessing say 'fill to the line in the cap') and not assume? How should a company do that?
Is the company HOPING people ASSUME and not follow the directions? Maybe. But even if you follow the line, if you're just a little over every measurement, you won't get as many "loads" from the bottle. Should the company be held at fault for that?
I know I'm taking this to the extreme, but using your example, should the light bulb manufacturer state on their package: 'Turn off after use'. After all, the more you use the product (in this case light bulbs), the quicker you run out.
Honestly, I've never looked at a drawing on a package as the final say when measuring. I might look at the drawing to see where the line is or a chart that says 'use line A for a light load, 1 for a normal load, and 2 for a heavy load'. But I'm going to look in the cap for the location of those lines. Because I know a skinnier cap will have the line higher while a wider cap will have the line lower.
I'm surprised by how many people use the cartoon picture on the box as a guide?Maybe its because I am a scientist, but I use the markings on the cap to measure.
I agree with the OP that it is slightly deceptive. But the marketing people are only taking advantage of the fact that people aren't paying enough attention. If you follow the directions and fill the cap to the 1 mark, I'm sure it is the same amount in each cup. So you can have the last laugh and not fall for their marketing "scheme".
Maggie
I don't read the package every time. But I generally don't look at the package for measurements. ESPECIALLY when using laundry detergents. Maybe that's because my family doesn't always get the same size bottle, so I rely on the markings on the cup because the cups are generally different sizes.Sam,
Do you read the package every time you buy the same product?
At some point do you ever feel secure with the idea that you 'know' how much to use? After you've used the same basic product for maybe 10 years? 1/2 cap Purex, throw it in and fill the fabric softener dispenser,etc?
A cap change is a fairly subtle change. Maybe not a 'deceptive' change, but one that could result in the ordinary person not taking particular notice of a few miligrams here or there.
I understand what you're saying, I just don't think it's an intentional act on the part of the companies to deceive or dupe the consumer.I did do go back and do the measure both to the "1 line" and as I stated previously the 1 line held the stated amount. Cap A was much more representative of the picture on the bottle and was approximately 1/2 a cap. When I poured the liquid into cap B it was only about 25% of the cap! It looked like a TINY amount of detergent in such a big cup and had I not realized the caps were two different sizes I would have assumed that my go to product hadn't changed the product to deceive me. I have been using this detergent for years and a 1/2 cap has been the proper amount. It isn't illegal to make the cap bigger and move the line down, but at the same time they should have moved the line down on the drawing. What about senior citizens who can't see those barely visible marking inside the cap? They would be duped by the deceptive picture on the back.
The container was the exact same size so there was no reason to change the cup size. I do think it was to trick the consumer into using more product.I understand what you're saying, I just don't think it's an intentional act on the part of the companies to deceive or dupe the consumer.
The color change was due to the different scent. Green = mountain breeze. Blue = after the rain.Personally, my first clue the cups might be different is the different color. Maybe I just think differently than others.![]()