Post processing software

caa1277

American by birth............Grumpy by choice!
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
388
I see that a lot of people process their photos using software. I've never done this. My question is, why do this? Am I missing out on making my photos better by doing so?

I've heard of Photoshop and Lightroom. Which do you prefer? Is one more user friendly than the other?

Thanks!
 
The great thing about post-processing is that you can make your pictures look however you want. And sometimes, if the shot isn't perfect straight out of the camera (over/under exposure.... temperature.... etc), you can make adjustments to get the scene as close to how you saw it. Or if you want to give a certain picture a unique look, that where PP comes in.


I'm a fan of Lightroom, myself. Very easy to use, and can still do a lot. Your camera might've even come with free software to get you started; even if it's super basic.
 
The great thing about post-processing is that you can make your pictures look however you want. And sometimes, if the shot isn't perfect straight out of the camera (over/under exposure.... temperature.... etc), you can make adjustments to get the scene as close to how you saw it. Or if you want to give a certain picture a unique look, that where PP comes in.


I'm a fan of Lightroom, myself. Very easy to use, and can still do a lot. Your camera might've even come with free software to get you started; even if it's super basic.

Thanks for the info. If I can find for free as a trial or something to try it, I just may do that.
 
One more thing. I'm currently shooting my pics in "L" format, is that okay oir should I switch to RAW or anything like that?
 

One more thing. I'm currently shooting my pics in "L" format, is that okay oir should I switch to RAW or anything like that?
RAW is ideal for post processing as it saves the most information about the image which allows the most leeway in the processing of said image. If you can, I'd typically advise to shoot in that format (or RAW+JPG if available and you'd rather have both, it's a touch slower than RAW and each shot takes up more disk space (erm...card space :p)).

"L" (or other JPG formats) are useful for burst (it's faster to write the smaller file, thus allowing more FPS) or snapshot (unlikely to bother with as much processing) styles of shooting, but will narrow the ability to process afterward a bit.

However, if you're more comfortable in JPG format, you can certainly still shoot in it, you just may not get as much out of post as someone shooting in RAW.
 
Like Cafeen said, RAW can really save a photo. If you overexpose or underexpose, you can recover a lot more with RAW and post processing. I, like Scott, use Lightroom and love it. It's pretty much the only program I use.
 
I, like Scott, use Lightroom and love it. It's pretty much the only program I use.
I forgot to include this bit, as I'm also a LR user. 99% of my processing is done through LR with a little bit via Photomatrix Pro (HDR stuff) and Photoshop Elements. LR also has the added benefit of amazing organization which helps when you're hard drives start filling up with photos :).
 
As others have said, RAW saves a lot more data in the file, and allows you to do more with the photo if you need to make adjustments. The one down side of RAW format, though, is that it is just that... raw data.

When you're shooting with your camera's "L" format to get a large, or high quality, JPEG file, the camera is doing a lot of work. It's applying settings to enhance the photo before it saves it to disk. It applies white balance, noise reduction, and other enhancements. The final product of these changes is what's saved to the file.

In RAW mode, you need to "develop" every photo. The camera saves exactly what it saw without applying any edits. Straight out of camera, the photos probably won't look as good as your current "L" photos do. Using a software package like Lightroom gives you the ability to develop the photos to your own creative tastes, and gives you much more flexibility for a better final product than might have been possible in JPEG mode. It is possible to create presets in Lightroom that would allow you to automate some of the developing during import, but know up front that there is a certain amount of post-processing time required with RAW that isn't necessarily required with JPEG.

Adobe offers a free 30-day trial of Lightroom on their web site. It's a fully-functional version of the software, and is available for download. Your camera may also have come with a free software package for RAW processing. For example, Canon DSLRs come with Digital Photo Professional.

One last consideration if you're thinking about RAW file format is the fact that the files are in a format that's proprietary to your camera manufacturer. They need to be converted to an open format (such as JPEG, GIF, PNG, etc) before they can be used in many software applications or shared to social media. To view them on your desktop, you would also need to install your manufacturer's CODEC on your computer, which allows Windows to read and display the files in explorer.

Lightroom is great for developing, but is also a wonderful organizational tool. I've been using it for about a year and a half, and would be absolutely lost without it now. I also have Photoshop CS6, which I only use if I need to do some serious editing (such as cloning something out of the photo, applying layers, etc.) Everything else I process directly in Lightroom.

Before spending the money to purchase Lightroom version 4, take into consideration Adobe's recent announcement that all future versions of their creative suite software will be available by subscription only. I'm not sure if this applies to Lightroom. If it does, it would mean that unless you're willing to purchase a monthly subscription, you'd be stuck at version 4 forever.
 
If you have any students at home, there are great prices on Lightroom (others too I'm sure) from various online educational software companies.
 
I am not a great picture taker, but I love taking pics with my Iphone.

What do you suggest I use for enhancing the photos on my computer after I down load them from the phone?

Thanks folks.
 
I use Photoshop Elements. I believe the newest iteration is 11. Elements has three ways (Full, Quick and Guided) to PP your images. Each of those has automatic settings to try. I will usually will start with some automatic settings and then adjust from there to get the look I want. I have found that most photos need some sharpening. I don't want to get technical, but most digital cameras have an AA filter (to some degree). This filter helps prevent moire' which will raise its ugly head when photographing repeating patterns. You can google it if you wish. But what it does is slightly softens your images. This can be recovered in PP. As others have said, you can adjust almost anything with the RAW images. Because I shoot a lot of motorsports, I use JPEG, because I need the higher burst rates. I will use RAW + JPEG when I'm shooting things that don't need the higher speeds. I tend to use as much of my "toolbox" as my camera provides for each situation. That is the beauty of the DSLR vs the compact cameras, a bigger "toolbox".
 


















Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE









DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom