To be honest, I am surprised they are still moving borrowed points back.
Me too. I understand the original reasoning of not having a huge surplus of points competing for reservations over the summer before they expired. But doing a quick scan of availability, I'm seeing most room types at most resorts being available through the rest of the summer (not surprising that many people are not rushing back to WDW right now).
So, if there seems to be plenty of availability to accommodate those guests who are willing/able to travel before those borrowed points would expire, I'm surprised they're not going back to the "borrowing is a final transaction" rule and allow points to expire. As long as there was availability so that owners
could have used their points, that shouldn't run afoul of timeshare laws and would reduce the number of excess points getting dumped into the next year.
Of course, for those with borrowed points who would lose them, that wouldn't be a desirable outcome and I'd hate to see folks losing points because of it. I'm just surprised that
DVC would continue to "unborrow" points now that resorts are open. That's good customer service for those who opt not to visit (at least in the near-term compared to points expiring), but I wonder about the 2nd and 3rd order effects for future points surplus.
Also, I wonder if they are continuing to be lenient for cancellations right now because it "DIS-incentivizes" (see what I did there?) people visiting during the next several months when they are trying to limit capacity? Although, honestly, I think they aren't going to have to refuse entry to anyone to remain within those limits... too many people unwilling/unable to travel in the near future.
DVC would be well within their rights legally to hold firm on points expiring if you choose not to keep your reservation since the resorts are open. I suspect there's a reason (beyond "pixie dust") that DVC is continuing to "unborrow" points even though they are under no obligation to do so with resorts open. Since near-term capacity no longer appears to be an issue, I wonder what else might be driving this?
Then again, maybe "pixie dust" is the sole reason they're continuing to do this.
