TheGoofster said:
>"However, the camera itself is not all that matters. It's the lense as well."<
Oh, without a doubt, but what I've found is that most (not all) but most of the people who get into extra lenses already have a good (or at least a working) understanding of cameras. I figured that I was already getting too wordy, and so left it at that.
Also, as to digital cameras, I will leave that alone. I have a very basic digital camera, but I don't know enough about them and their differences with non-digital SLR's to offer any opinions.
Let me also encourage anybody who might have more than just a passing interest in photography to take at least a basic course. Even though today's cameras are designed for ease of use, when you start learning about the different settings and features of your camera, you will find that there is so much more that you can actually do.
Absolutely!
The main differences between the standard point and shoots (non DSLR) and Digital SLR cameras are many. The main difference is the lenses and the photo sensor size.
Obviously this is not in the interest of all but, many of you photo takers may be interested in this information:
Let's compare the new Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2 (point and shoot costing around $460) vs. the Nikon D200 (Digital SLR costing around $1,800 with kit lense and upwards of $3,000 with higher end lenses):
Both of these cameras are at the higher ends of their respective categories. Both take INCREDIBLE photos. The Panasonic has the same photo resolution as the Nikon (believe it or not!). They BOTH have 10 mega pixels (believe it or not!).
however, here's a big difference. The Panasonic has a sensor size of 1/1.65" while the D200 has a sensor size of 23.6 x 15.8 mm. The larger sensor will allow for more overall size of the photo (so even though they have the same resolution, the D200 will create a more intensive image).
Of course, the D200 is much faster 1/8000 compared to Panasonic's 1/2000. However, most will never use that speed. The main difference in the lense. The interchangeable lenses will allow for better sharpness, color, and contrast, and focus.
I would suggest though (as a camera lover) that if you are someone wanting great shots, even fast shots, in low light great shots, yet don't want to spend nearly $2,000 on camera equipment or get in the photography business, get the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2. It is the pinacle of point and shoots and you will be astounded by the clarity and quality.
Of course, if you want to get into the interchangable lenses, get more serious and not spend $2,000 but still get a GREAT camera, get the Nikon D70S. Many of you on here know Safetymom. She uses the Nikon D70s, great camera at a great price.
Here is a great review of each camera if you are interested:
Panasonic Limux DMC-LX2
Nikon D70
Nikon D200