Hamilton, how is the adjustment from the D7000. I am thinking about selling my D5100 for the 5n. Did you keep your Tokina 11-16 to use manually with your 5n? Also what are your thoughts on the PD autofocus with the adapter compared to your D7000.
Hey HPS3!
Incredibly enough it was effortless. Most of the adjustment was rewriting muscle memory -- the interface on the camere itself is painless.
The biggest differences lies in the how you adjust settings with the camera and actually frame your shot. For instance: on the D7000 you have two dials to control your shutter and aperture, whereas on the 5N you have one click wheel with a toggle to switch between the two. It feels intuitive and you don't really lose "time" on the shot because, the other difference, makes up for it a huge way.
When you're framing on the 5N, you're using the LCD Screen and it's showing you a live preview of EXACTLY how your photo will come out. This is huge! The D7000 (and other SLRs) can mimic this somewhat, but will cap your shutter speed and has huge lag between the shutter press and shot. So the adjustment here, obviously, is to not try and nudge your eye into a viewfinder and hold it a bit more like a P&S.
Once you get the hang of it, like I have, it's very, very hard to imagine going back to a (non-electronic-)viewfinder. This is where the two dials to one comes back, because whereas on a smaller SLR you would have to use a button to swap from the shutter->aperture and STILL figure out your shot, the 5N will show you exactly what you're taking, bokeh and all. You're pretty much always left with exactly what you wanted, because you saw a 1:1 preview.
I did keep the Tokina 11-16 but have yet to use it -- I've been having tons of fun with the LA-EA2 and my Sony 16-50 2.8 + Sigma 50 1.4 instead.
The PDAF (w/ LA-EA2) vs CDAF (w/o) on the 5N is NIGHT and DAY -- I can't see myself going back to just the body without some super fast E-Mount glass to compensate. With the SAL1650, particularly, it's lightning fast. Against the D7000 it's highly comparable, if not as quick, for AF-S. AF-C it's a tad slower, but still quite good.
Some will argue that using it how I am, with Alpha-mount Glass and adapter, reduces the value of how the "system is meant to work", but I any many others say that that's the actual beauty of it. If I want to go extremely light, I'll throw on an E-Mount lens -- however if I don't mind extra load for better glass/AF, that option is available to me as well.
Even with the SAL1650, which is meaty, I'm still coming in with a lighter equipment load and arguably better performance against my D7000. The EVF is huge in this regard, again, because I'm able to setup my shot very quickly, frame it just right, shoot and walk away -- there's no second guessing or adjusting my exposure after reviewing a cap.
From the 5100->5N, I'd say it's a no brainer, especially if you invest in the LA-EA2 and some glass (you have my absolute highest recommendations for the SAL1650, it's an amazing lens). From the D7000, if you don't need to impress a client with a "bigger" and "more legit
looking" body nor shoot sports for a paycheck, I'd say it's a great move, as well.
Here are some shots I've taken with the camera since getting it, all with the LA-EA2+SAL1650:



I hope has answered your question
