zackiedawg
WEDway Peoplemover Rider
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2008
- Messages
- 3,950
Agreed - for correcting white balance, RAW is almost a necessity - you can adjust for poor white balance in JPG, but you're actually reworking the colors - correcting whites sometimes throws off other colors badly. In RAW, white balance can be altered or changed anytime, and as good as doing it in the camera.
As a JPG shooter, I rely on getting white balance where I want it up front, since correcting later is not easy. I'll use Auto sometimes when I know the camera can handle it, use presets on occasion like night shooting where I know it will work, and the rest of the time I use manual setting. Taking a WB reading is pretty easy - for me, best to do through a white balance cap, or a coffee filter, over the lens. Coffee filters are cheap and easy to carry, so that tends to be my go-to method most of the time.
As a JPG shooter, I rely on getting white balance where I want it up front, since correcting later is not easy. I'll use Auto sometimes when I know the camera can handle it, use presets on occasion like night shooting where I know it will work, and the rest of the time I use manual setting. Taking a WB reading is pretty easy - for me, best to do through a white balance cap, or a coffee filter, over the lens. Coffee filters are cheap and easy to carry, so that tends to be my go-to method most of the time.