Colleen27
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 24,190
Wow, that is taking micromanaging to a whole new level! I absolutely HATED when my kids' schools would get on these kind of kicks - a teacher or, worse, the principal discovers some new-and-improved organizational system and the kids have to adopt it whether or not what they were doing was working for them. With my oldest, the adjustment period was inevitably accompanied by a spike in not-turned-in work and all round disorganization as he worked to get used to the new system... which, as often as not, would be replaced with something "better" the following year.
Our school starts with Chromebooks in 1st grade and I'm not really fond of the change. I don't think e-textbooks are equivalent to their print counterparts, even when the content is identical, nor do I think typing notes and assignments has the same memory-value as writing by hand (and there is research supporting both positions, though it is far from settled science). And I think that effect is particularly strong with younger kids. But schools are constantly short of funds and devices + ebooks are often cheaper than hard-copy textbooks and printed consumables, and as you said, parents want virtually real-time access to their students' information, so there's a lot of pressure to look to technology as a silver-bullet solution.
My aunt was a second grade teacher (she retired at the end of this past school year after 40+yrs) and her 2nd graders had iPads. I believe it was 4th grade when the iPads would go home with the kids rather than being stored at the school.
I'm all for electronic communication but I thought that was a bit early for that kind.
I do think most of the paper stuff is bygone era if nothing else than waste and cost concerns and time spent. Obviously iPads, laptops, etc cost $$$ but printing on a gran scale probably does too and I'm assuming the school district can just buy the electronic license for a textbook and be done rather than worry about replacing more and more. And when things get updated from edition to edition it's probably easier to do that. Plus I feel more parents want quicker and easier access to things pertaining to their students.
That doesn't mean I think it's always a good thing for e-textbooks. If it's as you describe that's not exactly an encompassing learning material.
Our school starts with Chromebooks in 1st grade and I'm not really fond of the change. I don't think e-textbooks are equivalent to their print counterparts, even when the content is identical, nor do I think typing notes and assignments has the same memory-value as writing by hand (and there is research supporting both positions, though it is far from settled science). And I think that effect is particularly strong with younger kids. But schools are constantly short of funds and devices + ebooks are often cheaper than hard-copy textbooks and printed consumables, and as you said, parents want virtually real-time access to their students' information, so there's a lot of pressure to look to technology as a silver-bullet solution.