
There was a child in my YDS preschool that was this allergic to peanuts. We were asked not to give peanut products prior to sending our child to school if possible as he would react to the oils on the skin of another. I do not believe that reactions to others foods are this severe or this easily transferred to others...hence the reason they ban peanuts vs milk or eggs or fish. Most schools I know have a table for allergic children to eat at that would be free of allergens..specifically their allergen. In cases of milk, eggs, fish..those children would reduce their risk. In the case of peanuts the kid at the non allergy table walked out with peanut butter on his hands and went back to class and touched the other kids desk..causing a reaction. That doesn't happen with other foods.
I don't know why people keep arguing it "isn't enforceable" when lots of schools, districts and classrooms do ban it and do enforce it.
I am only in favor of a ban for young children. When it comes to food allergies in say Kindergarten for example I don't think fellow students can understand the risk their food poses to another (and for the record I have heard of classrooms being free of a given allergen if it is a high risk for a child..not just peanuts). After elementary age I think it is different as the allergic child has to learn to adjust and the peers are old enough to understand if told of an allergy a peer has.
My point is, realistically, if someone is THAT allergic there is no way they function society.
How do you avoid peanut residue amongst the general population? How do you avoid peanut residue in the super market, at the playground, in Disney World? You have no idea what the 10 million people that were there before you touched, or ate, or carried with them.
...and the reason that it is unenforceable is this. You can search every kid's lunch and snack and remove peanut products. You can ASK that people not serve peanut products at home, but there is no way to enforce that they actually comply. If a child is THAT allergic that she will have a deadly reaction from just contacting peanut residue, then a "peanut free" school is offering a very false sense of security. A school cannot police what people do in their own home
...and, yes, their are other allergens that do have a severe contact reaction. It's just that the people who suffer from them are not as vocal about their lobbying. Peanut allergies have become the "in" thing lately.
My ex's daughter had a severe shellfish allergy. She got hives from touching any shell fish. We never considered even suggesting anyone had to "ban" anything. She understood her allergy from a very early age, and knew what she couldn't have contact with. We would inform people of her allergy, but we would never consider telling others what they could or couldn't eat, or have.
If you read over the thread there are quite a few people who have said that they, or someone they know, has a severe contact allergy. It's not that it doesn't exist, it's that those allergies aren't as popular or news-worthy right now.
In all honesty, if my kid were THAT allergic to something that merely touching something that someone else who has touched peanuts would cause that severe of a reaction I couldn't, in all good conscience, send them to school. I know it's not realistic to assume that everyone is going to live their home lives catering to my child's allergy.
It's really just offering a false sense of security.