I am not trying to make anyone panic, the first two years of life are critical for language development and I disagree with waiting until a child is 3 to have them evaluated. I am a firm believer in early intervention, if a delay can be diagnosed early, a child can easily be on track with his peers when he reaches school age. Many kids will be evaluated and will not need therapy- what I'm saying is, it won't hurt to have an evaluation, but if an evaluation is put off and a child needs intervention, the child will become further behind.
ITA
Too many times I have read threads like this on these boards.
Too many times I have read about parents saying. "Don't worry. My child developed late and was fine."
My comment is TESTING NOW CAN'T HURT YOUR CHILD. WAITING CAN.
My DD had normal gross motor development (crawling, walking, etc.) but was far behind in speech development. At 18 months she had ONE word: duck. She should have had, minimally, 6 words NOT including mama and dada.
My Dr. had her ears tested (came out fine) and had a speech pathologist come assess her. My DD was diagnosed with sensory integration disorder and we now know, at age 5, that she is on the autistic spectrum.
She has been receiving speech and other therapies since age 18 months, and at age 5, no one can tell that she is "different."
Bottom line, insist on a speech eval and an occupational therapy eval. WHAT CAN IT HURT?
If you find out everything is fine, then great. But if you find out that your child needs intervention, you've done it at an early age and that is the key to overcoming any issues.
In many states, help for your child is FREE before age 3. That's why I recommend you have it done before age 3. After age 3, the school district takes over, and, while therapy is still free, it's, IMO, much harder to get qualified for.
I am not trying to scare or panic anyone, but instead relay my passion for early intervention.