- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Messages
- 45,094
I would reread paragraph 6.4
Then Exhibit "H" article 6, para. 6.2 (d) BVTC reserves the right to change the rules.... paraphrased
Then check out para 6.3 about "deleted" vacation homes.....
If Disney wanted to they could argue that any units not part of a direct sale, or the aggregate thereof, have been "deleted from inventory..
I still believe, and have not found anyone that says other wise, that as a private club "DVC" is allowed to have multiple levels of membership.
You're purchase still entitles you to membership just not the same member ship.
The bottom line is BVTC, DVC, DVCMC, etc have a way to limit the value of a third party transfer, if they so wanted.
It would be messy,
It would piss a lot of people off
And say far it has been easier on Disney's part to snatch contract via ROFR when they have people on the "waiting list"
I know two of my three BLT contracts where ROFR snatch backs.
Okay, but since a unit would have both direct and resale owners, I think it would be legally difficult to try to remove unit under that clause.
However, I do now wonder if the reading of that could potentially be applied to the new units being declarEd? I don’t know..it might be a stretch Or as you said pretty messy.